Letters to the Editor
 
Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) for staghorn calculi in the horseshoe kidney
Mari Ohtaka1, Takashi Kawahara1,2,3, Hiroki Ito2,3, Hideyuki Terao3, Shinnnosuke Kuroda3, Kengo Yasuda3, Hiroji Uemura1, Masahiro Yao2, Junichi Matsuzaki3
1Departments of Urology and Renal transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center.
2Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine.
3Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-201601-LE-10017

Address correspondence to:
Takashi kawahara
MD; Department of Urology
Yokohama City University Medical Center
4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku Yokohama City
Kanagawa, Japan

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Ohtaka M, Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Kuroda S, Yasuda K, Uemura H, Yao M, Matsuzaki J. Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) for staghorn calculi in the horseshoe kidney. Int J Case Rep Images 2016;7(2):140–142.


To the Editors,

Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) makes it is possible to continuously visualize the dilation of the ureter from the site of puncture to insertion of the nephro access sheath with minimal complications, and it is effective for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). We herein report the case of staghorn calculi in a horseshoe kidney successfully treated by PCNL in combination with UARN.

Horseshoe kidney is the most common of all renal fusion anomalies, with a prevalence of 0.25% in the general population [1]. However, performing nephrostomy on the target calyx is difficult without dilating the renal collecting system, even if an occlusion balloon catheter is used to create hydronephrosis.

We firstly reported ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) using with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) [2]. This procedure contributes surgeon to see intrarenal situation during from puncture to dilation. PCNL using with UARN contributes to higher stone free rates and less operation time. In this report, we performed PCNL with URAN technique for staghorn stone in a horseshoe kidney.

A 37-year-old female was referred to our department for further treatment. She had no remarkable symptoms. Two months from the initial visit, the patient was admitted to our department for PCNL to treat a right renal staghorn calculus (Figure 1). We performed PCNL in combination with UARN as described previously and successfully removed the target stone (Figure 2). The patient was discharged from the hospital 4 days after surgery.

Horseshoe kidney is a fused formation between both sides of kidneys in the lower poles. For renal stone in horseshoe kidney, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy, PCNL, and open surgery are candidate treatments [3] [4] [5]. Previous reports showed that PCNL in horseshoe kidney is effective and appropriate to puncture in the upper calyx by Al-Otabi et al. [6] [7]. Nephrostomy in the upper calyx contributed to access wide area in the renal pelvis and also in ureter [8].

Setting nephrostomy in the upper calyx has a disadvantage of longer distance from skin to the lower calyx. So nephroscope sometimes cannot reach to the target stone. UARN helps to control the target spot for puncture under the ureteroscopic approach [9]. Thus, the puncture spot is always ideal for performing PCNL with minimum complications. We previously reported two initial horseshoe kidney cases of PCNL using UARN [10]. The present case of staghorn calculi in the horseshoe kidney supports our results.

UARN is, therefore, considered to be an effective treatment modality for staghorn calculi in the horseshoe kidney.

Keywords: Horseshoe kidney, Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), Shock wave lithotripsy, Staghorn, Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN)

Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Preoperative images (a) KUB, (b) 3D-CT scan, (c) Coronal CT scan, and (d) Axial CT scan. The stone was occupied the whole left renal pelvis.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Postoperative KUB.


References
  1. Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, et al. Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 2003 Jul;170(1):48–51.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, et al. Ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: a new technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 2012 Aug;110(4):588–90.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Osther PJ, Razvi H, Liatsikos E, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy among patients with renal anomalies: patient characteristics and outcomes; a subgroup analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society global percutaneous nephrolithotomy study. J Endourol 2011 Oct;25(10):1627–32.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Jones DJ, Wickham JE, Kellett MJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1991 Mar;145(3):481–3.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Salas M, Gelet A, Martin X, Sanseverino R, Viguier JL, Dubernard JM. Horseshoe kidney: the impact of percutaneous surgery. Eur Urol 1992;21(2):134–7.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Al-Otaibi K, Hosking DH. Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):674–7.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Andreoni C, Portis AJ, Clayman RV. Retrograde renal pelvic access sheath to facilitate flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of urolithiasis in a horseshoe kidney. J Urol 2000 Oct;164(4):1290–1.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Stening SG, Bourne S. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. J Endourol 1998 Aug;12(4):359–62.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. El Ghoneimy MN, Kodera AS, Emran AM, Orban TZ, Shaban AM, El Gammal MM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: is rigid nephroscopy sufficient tool for complete clearance? A case series study. BMC Urol 2009 Nov 16;9:17.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, et al. Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for lower calyx calculi in horseshoe kidney: two case reports. J Med Case Rep 2012 Jul 10;6:194.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10
[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions:
Mari Ohtaka – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Takashi Kawahara – Substantial contributions to conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Hiroki Ito – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Hideyuki Terao – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Shinnnosuke Kuroda – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Kengo Yasuda – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Hiroji Uemura – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Masahiro Yao – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Junichi Matsuzaki – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2016 Mari Ohtaka et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.