Case Series
1 MD, Radiology Department, Ibn Sina Paediatric Teaching Hospital, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
2 MD, Professor, Radiology Department, Ibn Sina Paediatric Teaching Hospital, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
Address correspondence to:
Romeo Thierry Yehouenou Tessi
MD, Radiology Department, Ibn Sina Paediatric Teaching Hospital, Mohammed V University, BP 6527, Rabat,
Morocco
Message to Corresponding Author
Article ID: 101294Z01RT2022
Uterine malformations are developmental abnormalities of the Müllerian ducts. It is a heterogeneous group of pathology and anatomy whose diagnosis must be accurate. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis with 2D/3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard in accurate diagnosis. We reported two cases of uterine malformations about Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in a 20-year-old patient and 22-year-old patient. These anomalies are associated with renal malformations. The diagnosis was made by chance, by MRI which was performed in these patients. The management of these uterine malformations includes a psychological support component. There is a non-surgical treatment, but also, depending on the malformation, a surgical treatment. The complications of these malformations are dominated by recurrent miscarriages and infertility.
Keywords: Malformation, Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, MRI, Uterus
Uterine malformations are mostly the result of an abnormality in the development of the ducts of Müller during the process of genital cavity formation. They can occur at any of the three stages of organogenesis giving three types of anomalies. They are benign anomalies with a prevalence between 4% and 7% [1]. These malformations have an important impact on reproduction and are the cause of certain obstetrical complications and infertility. Imaging examinations remain essential for the accurate diagnosis of these malformations. 2D/3D ultrasound (US) remains the first-line examination, but MRI remains the gold standard for accurate diagnosis, with a view to optimal management. Several classifications exist but the most used are those of the American Fertility Society (AFS) and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE): CORNUTA (congenital uterine anomalies) [1].
The definitive treatment is surgical in most cases. Psychological support is essential in the management of some of these malformations.
Case 1
A 20-year-old female patient with a history of primary amenorrhea and development of secondary sexual characters in whom a pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a pelvic kidney and suspected uterine agenesis. Pelvic MRI revealed: total uterine agenesis, inferior vaginal remnant, normal ovaries, left pelvic kidney (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome was retained, classified as AFS 1/U5C4V4.
Case 2
A 22-year-old female patient with a history of primary amenorrhea and development of secondary sexual characters. A US scan was performed which suspected a uterine malformation. A pelvic MRI was ordered. Pelvic MRI revealed (Figure 3 and Figure 4):
The presence of two distinct rudimentary uterine horns with functional endometrium: the right horn sits at the level of the right iliac fossa communicating with the homolateral ovary, the left horn sits next to the iliac vessels communicating with the left ovary. It is associated with uterine cervix and vaginal agenesis. Ovaries were normal.
The diagnosis of MRKH syndrome was retained, classified as AFS 1/U5C4V4.
The frequency of uterine malformations has a significant impact on reproduction, ranging from 0.5% to 47%. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is rare with a frequency of 1/5000 women. In the general population, it varies between 0.5% and 4% [2]. The frequency rate of malformations in the fertile population is 3.8%, whereas it is 6.3% in the infertile population. These malformations are secondary to an anomaly in the development of the Müllerian ducts. They are therefore divided into three types according to organogenesis.
Depending on the stage of organogenesis [3]:
These anomalies are most often associated with anomalies of the urinary tree (renal agenesis, ectopic kidney) in 10–20% of cases [2]. In the infertile patient, population malformations are described with a prevalence of 7% with uterus arcuatus, 34% with septated uterus, 39% with bicornuate uterus, 11% with uterus didelphis, 5% with uterus unicornis, and 4% with aplasia of the uterus [4].
These different malformations have led to classifications in order to harmonize understanding. The best known are those of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) [5] and The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) [1] (Table 1 and Table 2).
The circumstances of discovery vary: primary amenorrhea, dyspareunia, infertility, repeated miscarriages, systematic ultrasound findings (of an obstetric ultrasound), imaging, complications (uterine ruptures, placental anomalies) [6].
The gynecological examination has an important place in the diagnosis. It allows the detection of vaginal and cervical abnormalities in cases of amenorrhea. It must be meticulous in looking for malformations of the external genitalia, the vagina, and the cervix. It is not sufficient, however, and must be supplemented by imaging examine [7].
The initial diagnostic method is the two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US), but also used are three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US), MRI, hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography, X-ray hysterosalpingography, video hysteroscopy, and video laparoscopy [7].
For diagnostic purposes, 3D US remains the examination of the first choice. It has good reproducibility, a high level of agreement among different observers provides additional and more reliable images, and allows for the evaluation of the cervix and the vagina.
The second reference examination is pelvic MRI which is the gold standard in the detection of uterovaginal malformations. Magnetic resonance imaging offers objective and reliable tridimensional information about all the genital and peritoneal anatomy, except for the tubes; it can be used in all cases, including obstructive malformations. Magnetic resonance imaging can differentiate between a hypoplastic, non-functional uterine horn, and a non-communicating horn with functional potential, and it provides excellent noninvasive evaluation of complex anomalies such as MRKH syndrome or obstructed hemivagina ipsilateral renal agenesis syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging is also ideal for accurate visualization of concurrent ovarian, renal, and lower urinary tract, and musculoskeletal abnormalities included in the imaged region.
The respective sensitivity and specificity are: Sensitivity: MRI 28.6–100%/3D US: 98–100%; Specificity: MRI 66–100%/3D US: 100% [8].
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser is a uterine aplasia and accounts for 3.4–10% of Müllerian anomalies. It is the most common form of Müllerian hypoplasia. The ovaries are normal and functional. In about 28% of these women, there is an ovarian malposition. Most girls have two rudimentary horns.
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser is a uterine aplasia and accounts for 3.4–10% of Müllerian anomalies. It is the most common form of Müllerian hypoplasia. The ovaries are normal and functional. In about 28% of these women, there is an ovarian malposition. Most girls have two rudimentary horns.
These are:
They can be seen on MRI as bilateral small soft-tissue masses of intermediate to slightly hyperintense signal similar to the myometrium, located adjacent to the ovaries along the pelvic sidewalls and sometimes connected by a triangular band of intermediate-signal tissue.
Treatment varies according to the stage of diagnosis. It is essentially two-fold [4],[7]:
Surgery and psychological support play an essential role in the management.
Uterine malformations are a heterogeneous group of disorders secondary to abnormal development of the Müllerian ducts. They are classified into three groups. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis by 3D US, followed by MRI, which remains the gold standard for diagnosis. They are most often associated with urinary and vaginal malformations. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is the rarest. In order of frequency, septate uteri are more common, followed by bicornuate uteri. Management varies according to the type of malformation and surgery plays an essential role; psychological support is sometimes necessary for follow-up.
1.
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 2013;28(8):2032–44. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
2.
Poncelet C, Aissaoui F. Uterine malformations and reproduction. [Article in French]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2007;35(9):821–5. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
3.
Yoo RE, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH. A systematic approach to the magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnosis of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies and their mimics. Abdom Imaging 2015;40(1):192–206. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
4.
Brucker SY, Rall K, Campo R, Oppelt P, Isaacson K. Treatment of congenital malformations. Semin Reprod Med 2011;29(2):101–12. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
5.
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49(6):944–55. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
6.
Mordefroid M, Levaillant JM. Malformations utérines: Utérus bicorne ou cloisonné?: Critères de différenciation en IRM et échographie 3D. Imagerie de la Femme 2008;18(2):89–100. [CrossRef]
7.
Passos IMPE, Britto RL. Diagnosis and treatment of müllerian malformations. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2020;59(2):183–8. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
8.
Rivas AG, Epelman M, Ellsworth PI, Podberesky DJ, Gould SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of Müllerian anomalies in girls: Concepts and controversies. Pediatr Radiol 2022;52(2):200–16. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]
We thank Prof. Latifa Chat and Prof. Nazik Allali, chief service and deputy chief service of Radiology Department, Ibn Sina Paediatric Teaching Hospital, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco, for their review of earlier drafts of the manuscript.
Author ContributionsRomeo Thierry Yehouenou Tessi - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Koudouhonon Rita Oze - Acquisition of data, Drafting the work, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Behyamet Onka - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Siham El Haddad - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Nazik Allali - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Latifa Chat - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Guarantor of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone
Consent StatementWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2022 Romeo Thierry Yehouenou Tessi et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.