Case Report


Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Let us recall the old physical examination

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  

1 School of Medicine – UNIG and Master's Program in Neurology – University of Vassouras, Brazil

2 Radiologist – Radiology Institute – IRSA, Brazil

3 Hospital Geral da Nova Iguaçu – Nova Iguaçu – RJ, Brazil

4 Hospital Geral da Nova Iguaçu – Nova Iguaçu – RJ, Brazil; School of Medicine – UNIG – RJ, Brazil

5 School of Medicine – São Paulo Federal University - UNIFESP, Brazil

Address correspondence to:

Antônio Marcos da Silva Catharino

Hospital Geral da Nova Iguaçu – Nova Iguaçu – RJ, Brazil; School of Medicine – UNIG – RJ,

Brazil

Message to Corresponding Author


Article ID: 101258Z01MO2021

doi:10.5348/101258Z01MO2021CR

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

How to cite this article

Orsini M, Alves S, Vianna JAS, Reis CHM, da Silva Catharino AM, Oliveira AB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Let us recall the old physical examination. Int J Case Rep Images 2021;12:101258Z01MO2021.

ABSTRACT


Introduction: Abdominal aortic aneurysms often surreptitiously expand and sometimes rupture. In most cases they cause a pulsing sensation in the abdomen. In cases of rupture, arterial grave hypotension occurs, sometimes followed by death. Physical examination is important and commonly directs physicians to perform Computed Tomography.

Case Report: We report a case of a 79-year-old woman, who reported that for approximately two years she has been suffering from expressive weight loss and discomfort due to a palpable “mass” in the abdominal region.

Conclusion: The long time elapsed between the complaints reported by the patient and the clinical and imaging diagnosis caught our attention. It is imperative for physicians, of any specialty, to assess patients globally and not only by subspecialty models.

Keywords: Abdominal, Aneurysm, Aorta, Dilation, Rupture

Introduction


Abdominal aortic aneurysms are usually found randomly through ultrasound or computed tomography examinations of the abdomen [1]. The abusive use of nicotine and carbon monoxide causes depletion of elastin in the arterial layers, compromising the aortic wall. In addition, in most abdominal aortic aneurysms, thrombosis and wall calcifications occur, both originating from the atherosclerotic process [2]. Several factors threaten the vascular endothelium, such as smoking, lipid products, systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), among others. We illustrate the case of a patient with extensive abdominal aortic aneurysm and pay attention to the urgent nature of its approach [3],[4],[5].

Case Report


A 79-year-old, female, domestic, reported that about two years ago she had started to lose weight, had dizziness, lower back pain, and a feeling of fainting. Months later, she noticed a palpable mass in the abdomen. During this time, she had been seen by countless doctors from the family clinic that she considers a lipoma. She was provided assistance at a health center due to moderate hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia smoking history of 3 packs/day, and alcoholism. When seeking help at the neurology clinic due to suspicion of Parkinson's disease, she reported the symptoms. On physical examination, a possible painless, mobile “mass” was identified, with the presence of murmurs on auscultation and “flag sign.” The measurement of systemic blood pressure was evaluated with a patient in the supine position, sitting and standing, in the upper and lower arms, comparing both horizontally and vertically. Postural hypotension was identified in the maneuver of choice for the standing position (slide of 40 | 15 mmHg) of blood pressure. With the patient naked, the assessment of the arteries of the lower limbs was followed by palpation of the femoral, popliteal, posterior and anterior tibial pulses, and dorsal artery of the foot (pediosa). The arterial pulse was characteristic of a bisferiens pulse. After clinical evaluation, computed tomography of the abdomen was suggested as the exam of choice. Computed tomography imaging after venous contrast and with three-dimensional and volumetric reconstructions (Figure 1) showed fusiform aneurysmal dilatation of the extension of the infra-renal segment of the aorta. Maximum transverse diameters of 10 × 9.9 cm and longitudinal extension of 20 cm, starting at the origin of the right renal artery until the plane of the bifurcation (Figure 2). The proximal neck of the aneurysm had a rounded morphology and measured 3.5 cm in the longest axial axis (Figure 3). It presented a mural thrombus, which determined a pervious lumen of 5.3 × 4.2 cm. Lastly, the abdominal aorta was tortuous with diffuse atheromatous disease (Figure 3).

Figure 1: Extensive fusiform aneurysmal dilatation of the infrarenal segment of the aorta.

Share Image:

Figure 2: Transverse diameters of 10 × 9.9 cm and longitudinal extension of 20 cm, starting at an origin of the right renal artery.

Share Image:

Figure 3: The proximal neck of the aneurysm has a rounded morphology and measures 3.5 cm longer in the axial axis.

Share Image:

Discussion


Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) can develop in any age group, however, the prevalence is higher between 50 and 80 years. There is a relationship between hypertension and smoking. About 20% of abdominal aneurysms rupture over time. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture is more frequent in large aneurysms, with rapidly progressive growth or with recent onset of symptoms [5],[6].

In some cases, AAA may be associated with neoplasms, chronic renal failure resulting from atherothrombosis of the renal arteries, in addition to concomitant stenotic lesions in several arteries. The result of surgical risk was transmitted by the overlapping of pathologies associated with AAA, gender, and endovascular treatment, very effective against catastrophic rupture of such. The natural history of AAA demonstrates a continuous increase in the diameter of the dilation, most often culminating in rupture. The risk of rupture is proportional to size, with an annual rate of 0% for AAA smaller than 4 cm, 1% between 4 and 4.9 cm, 11% between 5 and 5.9 cm, and 25% or more for larger than 6 cm [7],[8],[9].

Our patient reported symptom onset about two years ago, although he considers rupture a high risk. Elective repair is a treatment option that, when indicated based on the size of the aneurysm and according to national guidelines, is recommended when the AAA is greater than 5.4 cm [6]. Currently, the indication for surgery or EVAR (Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair) for aneurysms larger than 5.4 cm is a consensus [6].

Conclusion


We present the case of a patient with extensive abdominal aortic aneurysm. In addition, we reinforce the need for early diagnosis and urgent treatment of the clinical picture and visualization by computed tomography.

REFERENCES


1.

Kitagawa A, Mastracci TM, von Allmen R, Powell JT. The role of diameter versus volume as the best prognostic measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2013;58(1):258-65. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

2.

Mirza TA, Karthikesalingam A, Jackson D, et al. Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of endoleak after EVAR: Systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;39(4):418–28. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

3.

Rahimi SA, Rowe VL, Annambhotla S, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Medscape. 2014. [Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1979501-overview#a0101]   Back to citation no. 1  

4.

de Assis JAC, Duque MAA. Aneurisma de aorta abdominal, aspectos, patogenicidade, diagnóstico e terapia abdominal aortic aneurism, aspects, pathogenicity, diagnosis and therapy. Braz J of Develop 2020;6(11):92736–49. [CrossRef]   Back to citation no. 1  

5.

Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, MacSweeney STR, Braithwaite BD. A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm – results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32(5):506–13. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

6.

Reimerink JJ., Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC, et al. Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2013;258(2):248–56. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

7.

Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallett JW Jr. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study. N Engl J Med 1989;321(15):1009–14. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

8.

Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Fillinger MF, Cronenwett JL. Should endovascular surgery lower the threshold for abdominal aortic aneurysms? J Vasc Surg 1999;29(6):973–85. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

9.

Holt PJE, Karthikesalingam A, Poloniecki JD, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Propensity scored analysis of outcomes after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2010;97(4):496–503. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

SUPPORTING INFORMATION


Author Contributions

Marco Orsini - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Silvia Alves - Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

João Alberto Silveira Vianna - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Carlos Henrique Melo Reis - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Antônio Marcos da Silva Catharino - Analysis of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Acary Bulle Oliveira - Analysis of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Guarantor of Submission

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Source of Support

None

Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright

© 2021 Marco Orsini et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.