Clinical Image


Tropheryma whipplei—A rare and diagnostically challenging cause of culture-negative endocarditis

,  ,  ,  

1 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

2 Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

3 University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

Address correspondence to:

Hong Loan Nguyen

MD, Baylor College of Medicine, McNair Campus, 7200 Cambridge St., Suite 8B, Houston, Texas 77030,

USA

Message to Corresponding Author


Article ID: 101103Z01HN2020

doi:10.5348/101103Z01HN2020CR

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

How to cite this article

Nguyen HL, Goebel M, Palaskas N, McCants D. Tropheryma whipplei—A rare and diagnostically challenging cause of culture-negative endocarditis. Int J Case Rep Images 2020;11:101103Z01HN2020.

ABSTRACT


No Abstract

Keywords: Culture-negative endocarditis, Tropheryma whipplei, Whipple’s disease, Whipple’s endocarditis

Case Report


A 55-year-old African American woman presented with fatigue and unintentional weight loss for six months; otherwise the review of systems was negative. On physical examination she was found to have a new murmur, prompting evaluation with a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) which revealed an aortic valvular mass and aortic regurgitation. Subsequent transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a 2.9 × 1 cm mass on the right aortic valve (AV) coronary cusp (Figure 1A) with associated flail leaflet resulting in severe aortic regurgitation (Figure 1B) and moderate thickening of mitral valve (MV) (Figure 1C) with moderate mitral regurgitation (Figure 1D). Three sets of blood cultures were obtained before empiric vancomycin and ampicillin-sulbactam was initiated. A total of seven sets of blood cultures (collected on four different days) were subsequently negative. Other serologic tests were negative, including Q fever immunoglobulin G (IgG), Bartonella henselae immunoglobulin M (IgM)/IgG, Bartonella quintana IgM/IgG, Brucella IgM, and antinuclear antibody (ANA). Given the severity of aortic regurgitation and the size of the aortic valve vegetation, on hospital day 10 she underwent AV replacement with a mechanical AV prosthesis as well as debridement of MV leaflet vegetations identified intraoperatively. Aortic valve histopathology showed acute inflammation with inflamed fibrinous vegetation. Smear for acid-fast bacilli and Gram stain were negative. Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stains were positive and revealed abundant rod-shaped bacteria (Figure 2). Tropheryma whipplei-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the explanted aortic valve was positive.

After PCR detection of T. whipplei, the patient was discharged on intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone. She completed four weeks of ceftriaxone and then transitioned to oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole one double strength tablet twice daily. She completed 16 months of maintenance therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which she tolerated well with no evidence of relapse.

Figure 1: Transesophageal echocardiogram images. (A) Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) image shows 2.9 × 1 cm mass (circled) on the right coronary cusp of the aortic valve coronary. (B) TEE image with color Doppler shows severe aortic regurgitation. (C) and (D) TEE image shows moderate mitral valve thickening with mitral regurgitation on color Doppler.

Share Image:

Figure 2: Histopathology images of explanted aortic valve. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain, 400× magnification, shows acute inflammation and fibrin deposition. (B) Gram stain, 200× magnification, no organisms seen. (C) and (D) Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) stain, 20× magnification and 600× magnification, respectively, shows heavy, dark staining of bacteria. (E) and (F) Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain, 100× magnification and 1000× magnification, respectively, shows intensely staining rod-shaped bacteria.

Share Image:

Discussion


Infective endocarditis is a rare endovascular infection with a high mortality rate [1]. In the majority of cases, infective endocarditis is diagnosed by positive blood cultures. Standard blood culture technique is adequate for detecting most cultivable causes of infective endocarditis [2]. However, blood-culture-negative endocarditis, which ranges in incidence from 2.5% to 31%, presents as a diagnostic and management challenge due to difficulty in identifying microorganisms using routine culture methods [3]. Utilizing advanced molecular techniques, such as PCR, serologic testing, or valvular biopsy, the etiology of culture-negative endocarditis can be elucidated in about 60% of cases [1]. Depending on geographic and epidemiologic risk factors, causes of culture-negative endocarditis include but are not limited to Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella, Brucella, Mycoplasma, T. whipplei, and Legionella species [1]. Although rare, Whipple’s disease has been increasingly recognized as a cause of culture-negative endocarditis. In an observational cohort study, T. whipplei was detected in 6.3% of patients found to have bacterial endocarditis on explanted cardiac valves and was more common than Bartonella, Coxiella, and HACEK group organisms combined [4].

Tropheryma whipplei infection typically causes classic Whipple’s disease which involves multiple organs, with clinical manifestations including arthralgia, weight loss, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. However, it can also present as chronic localized infection, such as endocarditis [5]. Although isolated Whipple’s endocarditis without systemic involvement has been reported in the literature [6],[7],[8], this disease entity is rare. A recent literature review by McGee et al. identified 44 publications totaling 169 patients with Whipple’s endocarditis [9]. While the incidence of classic Whipple’s disease is estimated to be between 1 and 6 new cases per 10,000,000 persons per year worldwide [5], the incidence of isolated Whipple’s endocarditis is unknown.

Diagnosis of Whipple’s endocarditis is challenging due to negative blood cultures and the frequent absence of systemic signs of infection such as fever [5],[6]. Tropheryma whipplei has an estimated 18-day generation time, which makes it one of the slowest growing human pathogens. Tropheryma whipplei cultivation is extremely difficult and is limited to specialized research laboratories [10]. Therefore, routine culture as a diagnostic method is not recommended. Whipple’s disease is primarily diagnosed by histopathology and PCR testing of the involved tissue, such as the explanted valve in the case of Whipple’s endocarditis. Periodic acid-Schiff stain shows T. whipplei-infected macrophages while silver stain shows thin bacilli. Polymerase chain reaction utilizing broad-range or T. whipplei-specific primers and immunohistochemical staining with antibodies against T. whipplei increase the diagnostic yield [4],[10]. Overall, employing multimodality diagnostic testing, such as culture, histopathology, and molecular techniques, is important for the diagnosis of culture-negative and Whipple’s endocarditis.

The optimal antibiotic regimen and treatment duration for Whipple’s endocarditis are unknown. Recommended regimens consist of initial and maintenance phases, including two weeks of IV ceftriaxone or penicillin and at least 12 months of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or doxycycline with hydroxychloroquine [10]. Such long-term commitment to medical treatment demands an accurate diagnosis.

Conclusion


The diagnosis of Whipple’s endocarditis is challenging due to the inadequacies of traditional blood culture techniques to grow the organism. Polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining require explanted valve tissue, but this is invasive. Having a definitive laboratory diagnosis can significantly impact medical management. This case highlights the importance of molecular testing in the diagnosis and management of Whipple’s endocarditis, a rare and diagnostically challenging cause of culture-negative endocarditis.

REFERENCES


1.

Holland TL, Baddour LM, Bayer AS, Hoen B, Miro JM, Fowler VG Jr. Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16059. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

2.

Liesman RM, Pritt BS, Maleszewski JJ, Patel R. Laboratory diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55(9):2599–608. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

3.

Chan KL, Embil JM. Endocarditis. London: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 258.   Back to citation no. 1  

4.

Geissdörfer W, Moos V, Moter A, et al. High frequency of Tropheryma whipplei in culture-negative endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50(2):216–22. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

5.

Dolmans RA, Boel CH, Lacle MM, Kusters JG. Clinical manifestations, treatment, and diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2017;30(2):529–55. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

6.

Marín M, Muñoz P, Sànchez M, Del Rosal M, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Bouza E. Tropheryma whipplei infective endocarditis as the only manifestation of Whipple’s disease. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45(6):2078–81. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

7.

Chan V, Wang B, Veinot JP, et al. Tropheryma whipplei aortic valve endocarditis without systemic Whipple’s disease. Int J Infect Dis 2011;15(11):e804–6. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

8.

Escher R, Roth S, Droz S, Egli K, Altwegg M, Täuber MG. Endocarditis due to Tropheryma whipplei: Rapid detection, limited genetic diversity, and long-term clinical outcome in a local experience. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010;16(8):1213–22. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

9.

McGee M, Brienesse S, Chong B, Levendel A, Lai K. Tropheryma whipplei endocarditis: Case presentation and review of the literature. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018;6 (1):ofy330. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

10.

Schneider T, Moos V, Loddenkemper C, Marth T, Fenollar F, Raoult D. Whipple’s disease: New aspects of pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet Infect Dis 2008;8(3):179–90. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

SUPPORTING INFORMATION


Acknowledgments

Histopathology images were provided by Dr. Kenneth Muldrew, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine. The case has been presented as a poster contribution in the Conference of American College of Cardiology on March 16, 2019.

Author Contributions

Hong Loan Nguyen - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Melanie Goebel - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Nicolas Palaskas - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

David McCants - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Guarantor of Submission

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Source of Support

None

Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright

© 2020 Hong Loan Nguyen et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.