Case Report
 
Penile strangulation due to a metal ring: A case report
Matsumiya K1, Kawahara T1,2, Yamashita Y2, Hayashi Y2,1,3, Shimokihara K1, Tsutsumi S1, Takamoto D1, Mochizuki T1, Hattori Y1, Teranishi J1, Miyoshi Y1, Yumura Y1, Yao M3, Uemura H1
1Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
2Department of Dental Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
3Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

Article ID: Z01201707CR10810KM
doi:10.5348/ijcri-201771-CR-10810

Address correspondence to:
Takashi Kawahara
M.D., Ph.D, Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation
Yokohama City University Medical Center
Yokohama
Japan

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Full Text]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Matsumiya K, Kawahara T, Yamashita Y, Hayashi Y, Shimokihara K, Tsutsumi S, Takamoto D, Mochizuki T, Hattori Y, Teranishi J, Miyoshi Y, Yumura Y, Yao M, Uemura H. Penile strangulation due to a metal ring: A case report. Int J Case Rep Images 2017;8(7):470–472.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Penile strangulation is a condition in which a foreign material compresses the penis, resulting in penile enlargement due to a circulatory disturbance.
Case Report: A 68-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital in order to undergo the removal of a metal ring that had strangled his penis. The ring was successfully removed using an airtime cutter. His penis showed no ischemic lesions at one week after removal.
Conclusion: We herein report a rare case of penile strangulation.

Keywords: Strangulation, Incarceration, Penile



[HTML Full Text]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Kentaro Matsumiya – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Takashi Kawahara – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yosuke Yamashita – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yutaro Hayashi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Kota Shimokihara – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Sohgo Tsutsumi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Daiji Takamoto – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Taku Mochizuki – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yusuke Hattori – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Jun-ichi Teranishi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yasuhide Miyoshi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yasushi Yumura – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Masahiro Yao – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Hiroji Uemura – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2017 Kentaro Matsumiya et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.