Case Report
 
Penile strangulation due to a metal ring: A case report
Matsumiya K1, Kawahara T1,2, Yamashita Y2, Hayashi Y2,1,3, Shimokihara K1, Tsutsumi S1, Takamoto D1, Mochizuki T1, Hattori Y1, Teranishi J1, Miyoshi Y1, Yumura Y1, Yao M3, Uemura H1
1Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
2Department of Dental Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
3Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

Article ID: Z01201707CR10810KM
doi:10.5348/ijcri-201771-CR-10810

Address correspondence to:
Takashi Kawahara
M.D., Ph.D, Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation
Yokohama City University Medical Center
Yokohama
Japan

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Matsumiya K, Kawahara T, Yamashita Y, Hayashi Y, Shimokihara K, Tsutsumi S, Takamoto D, Mochizuki T, Hattori Y, Teranishi J, Miyoshi Y, Yumura Y, Yao M, Uemura H. Penile strangulation due to a metal ring: A case report. Int J Case Rep Images 2017;8(7):470–472.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Penile strangulation is a condition in which a foreign material compresses the penis, resulting in penile enlargement due to a circulatory disturbance.
Case Report: A 68-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital in order to undergo the removal of a metal ring that had strangled his penis. The ring was successfully removed using an airtime cutter. His penis showed no ischemic lesions at one week after removal.
Conclusion: We herein report a rare case of penile strangulation.

Keywords: Strangulation, Incarceration, Penile


INTRODUCTION

Penile strangulation is a condition in which a foreign material compresses the penis, resulting in penile enlargement due to a circulatory disturbance [1]. We herein describe a case of penile strangulation due to a metal ring that the patient had worn to the reduce pain of varicocele.


CASE REPORT

A 68-year-old male was referred to our hospital with an enlargement of his penis due to a metal ring. He had been inserting his penis into a metal ring to reduce the pain associated with varicocele for ten years. Three hours before his initial visit, he could not remove this ring and experienced difficulty in urination (Figure 1). To treat his condition, the patient was referred to our hospital at six hours after penile strangulation. We initially attempted to remove the ring using a ring cutter and wire cutter; however, this failed to cut the ring. We then asked a dental surgeon to cut the ring using an airtime cutter. The ring was successfully cut and removed from his penis (Figure 2) and (Figure 3).



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Penile strangulation by a metal ring.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: The metal ring after removal.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 3: One week after removal.



DISCUSSION

Penile strangulation is caused when an object compresses the penis. In most cases, the removal of the foreign body is difficult because of priapism in the external penis. Penile strangulation represents an emergency disease, as the compression of the penis for an extended period of time interrupts the blood flow, resulting in penile ischemia [1].

In previous reports, the strangled penile body was divided by soft and hard materials. Rubber and vinyl have been reported as soft materials, while metal rings, metallic pipes, and the tops of PET bottles have been reported as hard materials. Soft materials compress the skin deeply, with ulceration occurring in severe cases. Hard materials first lead to edema rather than ulceration. The duration of strangulation in the previously reported cases has ranged from one hour to ten years [1].

In the present case, the patient had strangled his penis in order to reduce the pain associated with varicocele. Previous reports showed that the reasons for penile strangulation were divided into non-sexual and sexual purposes. The sexual purposes have included (but are not limited to) improving energy, extending erection time, and enlarging the penis [2]. The duration of strangulation varied according to the reasons. The patients in whom penile strangulation occurred due to non-sexual reasons presented to hospital earlier than the patients in whom the purpose was sexual [3]. In this case, the patient performed penile strangulation for a therapeutic reason. The patient presented to a hospital in the early stage of penile strangulation, after experiencing difficult urination. We have to remind that inappropriate usage of foreign bodies resulting in penile strangulation.

The removal of the object strangling the penis is the most important aspect of treatment in cases of penile strangulation. A previous report suggested that the object can be removed at up to 12 hours without any complications [1]. In our case, the rapid removal might have contributed to the lack of any complications. Instruments that have been used in removal have included pincers, a plaster cutter, a hammer, and a grinder [4][5][6]. However, air turbines for dental use are most frequently used to remove such objects [5]. The top of the air turbine is coated with diamonds and spins at a rate of 400,000 times per minute, which gives it a high cutting ability. Water can be poured to reduce the frictional heat and improve the safety of the procedure—as we did in our case [7]. When standard procedures including the use of a ring cutter fail to cut the object, the use of an air turbine with the assistance of a dental surgeon is sometimes necessary [8]. Followed-up is needed to confirm no ischemia after removal of metallic ring.


CONCLUSION

We herein describe a case of penile strangulation due to a metal ring that the patient had worn to the reduce pain of varicocele. The removal of the object strangling the penis is the most important aspect of treatment in cases of penile strangulation.


REFERENCES
  1. Martínez-Piñeiro L, Djakovic N, Plas E, et al. EAU guidelines on urethral trauma. Eur Urol 2010 May;57(5):791–803.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Tanabe N, Muya M, Isonokami M, Kozuka T, Honda T, Ohtani H. Lymphedema due to chronic penile strangulation: A case report. J Dermatol 1996 Sep;23(9):648–51.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Tomonori Kato TK, Ikeda R, Nakamura T, Akakura K, Hikage T. Penile strangulation: A case report. Jpn J Urol Surg 2003;16(5):613–5.    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Vähäsarja VJ, Hellström PA, Serlo W, Kontturi MJ. Treatment of penile incarceration by the string method: 2 case reports. J Urol 1993 Feb;149(2):372–3.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Sinha BB. Penile incarceration by a metallic object. Br J Surg 1988 Jan;75(1):33.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Theiss M, Hofmockel G, Frohmüller HG. Fournier's gangrene in a patient with erectile dysfunction following use of a mechanical erection aid device. J Urol 1995 Jun;153(6):1921–2.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Noh J, Kang TW, Heo T, Kwon DD, Park K, Ryu SB. Penile strangulation treated with the modified string method. Urology 2004 Sep;64(3):591.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Koji Okihara KS, Miyashita H. Incarceration of the penis: A case report. Jpn J Urol Surg 2002;15(5):579–82.    Back to citation no. 8

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Kentaro Matsumiya – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Takashi Kawahara – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yosuke Yamashita – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yutaro Hayashi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Kota Shimokihara – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Sohgo Tsutsumi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Daiji Takamoto – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Taku Mochizuki – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yusuke Hattori – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Jun-ichi Teranishi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yasuhide Miyoshi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Yasushi Yumura – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Masahiro Yao – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Hiroji Uemura – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2017 Kentaro Matsumiya et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.