Case Series
 
Guidewire technique: Removal of a doorknob in tourniquet syndrome
Phee-Kheng Cheah1, Xiang-Yun Yang2, Azlan Kamalludin3, Thian-Lian Soo4
1Emergency and Trauma Department, Sabah Women and Children´s Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
2Emergency and Trauma Department, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
3Emergency and Trauma Department, Langkawi Hospital, Pulau Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia
4Paediatric Department, Sabah Women and Children´s Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Article ID: Z01201704CS10085PC
doi:10.5348/ijcri-201706-CS-10085

Address correspondence to:
Dr. Phee-Kheng Cheah
Emergency Physician and Head, Emergency and Trauma Department, Sabah Women and Children´s Hospital
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Full Text]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Cheah PK, Yang XY, Kamalludin A, Soo TL. Guidewire technique: Removal of a doorknob in tourniquet syndrome. Int J Case Rep Images 2017;8(4):233–238.


Abstract

Introduction: Tourniquet syndrome caused by a constricting band is common, and can be removed either by intact removal or by division. Finding a doorknob as the constrictor is rare and challenging to manage due to its bulky size, larger area of contact with the skin surface, and difficult access to the constricting site. The optimal removal technique has not yet been established.
Case Series: This case series explored two different techniques–cutting with a metal saw, and intact removal using guidewire technique which uses the guidewire from a central venous catheter. The first case was an 8-year-old boy who presented with his right index finger stuck to a doorknob, and the team utilized a metal saw to cut open the doorknob in order to release the finger. The second case was a 10-year-old boy also with his right index finger stuck in the doorknob. The team used the guidewire technique and successfully removed the doorknob intact.
Conclusion: While both techniques resulted in successful removal with minimal soft tissue injury, the former was more tedious, traumatizing, time-consuming and required technical help that is not immediately available. This can potentially cause delay in removal of the constrictor. We believe that intact removal using our technique is superior to cutting the doorknob because it is simple, cost-effective and ultimately a low risk and time-saving procedure.

Keywords: Constricting band, Doorknob, Guidewire technique, Tourniquet syndrome


[HTML Full Text]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Phee-Kheng Cheah – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published.
Xiang-Yun Yang – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published.
Azlan Kamalludin – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published.
Thian-Lian Soo – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published.
Guarantor
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2017 Phee-Kheng Cheah et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.