Case Report
 
Isolated plexiform neurofibroma presenting as white lesion of vulva: A case report
Sunita Arora1, Rupneet Kaur2, Poonam Goel3, RPS Punia4
1Assistant Professor, Department of OBS and Gynaecology, Govt Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
2Senior Resident, Department of OBS and Gynaecology, Govt Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
3Professor, Department of OBS and Gynaecology, Govt Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
4Department of Pathology, Government Medical College & Hospital (GMCH), Sector-32, Chandigarh, India.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-201489-CR-10400

Address correspondence to:
Dr. Sunita Arora
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Government Medical College & Hospital (GMCH)
Sector-32, Chandigarh
India 160030
Phone: 91-172-2646221; Res: 91-9646121658
Email: drsunitaarora@yahoo.com

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Arora S, Kaur R, Goel P, Punia RPS. Isolated plexiform neurofibroma presenting as white lesion of vulva: A case report. Int J Case Rep Images 2014;5(7):505–508.


Abstract
Introduction: Neurofibromas commonly involve peripheral nervous system but rarely may involve genital organs such as labia, clitoris, vulva, vagina and cervix.
Case Report: We present a case of isolated plexiform neurofibroma of vulva which presented as white lesion of vulva. A tissue biopsy was done and the histopathological analysis-demonstrated plexiform neurofibroma with spindle shaped cells with wavy nuclei and bland nuclear chromatin. The immunohistochemical staining showed strong positivity for S-100 protein which has a strong correlation with neurofibromatosis-1. No systemic sign of neurofibromatosis was found.
Conclusion: Plexiform neurofibroma may present as isolated white lesion of the vulva without any systemic involvement in the form of neurofibromatosis. So a tissue biopsy is mandatory for definitive diagnosis of any white lesion of vulva.

Keywords: Vulva, White lesion, Plexiform neurofibroma


Introduction

Neurofibroma is one of the uncommonly occurring mesenchymal lesions in vulvo-vaginal region. Neurofibroma as such is a disease of the peripheral nervous system and occurs most commonly in the extremities. Neurofibromas have been categorized as cutaneous neurofibromas (both localized and diffuse types), intraneural neurofibromas (localized and plexiform), massive soft tissue neurofibromas (solitary or multiple) and sporadic neurofibromas or those associated with neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1) [1] [2]. Plexiform neurofibroma is usually recognized as a pathognomonic criterion of NF-1 (or von Recklinghausen's disease). It may also occur as a solitary lesion arising in a nerve root [3]. These lesions commonly involve labia and clitoris among the female genital tract. Lesions may also affect the vagina, cervix, endometrium myometrium, and ovary and may be associated with urinary tract neruofibromatosis [4]. We present a case of asymptomatic isolated vulvar neurofibroma with unusual presentation as white lesion of vulva without systemic involvement. Already known major differential diagnosis of hypopigmented lesion of vulva are lichen sclerosis, squamous cell hyperplasia, squamous cell carcinoma in situ and Paget''s disease of vulva.


Case Report

A 57-year-old female presented in the gynecology outpatient department with complains of postmenopausal discharge per vaginam, irregular bleeding per vaginam and post coital bleeding since last 36 months. She was a multiparous female, a mother of five children and was menopausal for 15 years. She had past history of pulmonary Koch for which she took antitubercular treatment for two years. There was no family history of neurofibromatosis. On genital examination, she was found to have flat hypopigmented vulvar lesions involving labia minora and labia majora (Figure 1). Clitoris was healthy. Rest of the external genitalia looked healthy. The patient was aware of the lesion for past one year but did not seek any medical treatment. On speculum examination cervix was suspicious in appearance, flushed up with vaginal vault. Rest of the vaginal mucosa was healthy. On systemic examination, there were no swelling or café-au-lait spots over the body. No nerve involvement was observed. On ultrasonography uterus measured 7.53x3.99x2.95 cm with normal myometrium and endometrium. Thickness of endometrial cavity containing fluid measured 11.7 mm. Bilateral ovaries were normal. Cervical cytology showed atrophic smear. After a course of antibiotics for cervicitis, colposcopy showed inflammatory changes only and a punch biopsy was taken. A vulvar biopsy from the white lesion of vulva and an endometrial sampling were also taken.

Histopathologically, microscopic examination of vulvar biopsy revealed focally atrophic epidermis. Dermis showed fascicles and bundles. The tissue comprised of spindle shaped cells with wavy nuclei and bland nuclear chromatin. No atypia or necrosis was seen in the tissue. A diagnosis of plexiform neurofibroma was obvious on microscopic examination (Figure 2). Immunohistochemically, the tumor was strongly positive for S-100 protein (Figure 3) which is seen strongly in association with NF-1. Endometrial histopathology showed chronic endometritis and cervical biopsy showed chronic cervicitis. At third, sixth and twelth month follow-up patient is healthy with no complains. There are no color changes, no mass lesion in (white lesion) involved area of vulva.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: External genitalia on examination



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Microscopic examination of plexiform neurofibroma (H&E stain, x100).



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 3: Immunohistochemical staining for S-100 protein was positive in plexiform neurofibroma (S-100, x200).



Discussion

Neurofibroma of female genital system can be categorized according to organ involvement into three categories: 1. Vulvar 2. Clitoral 3. Pelvic (cervical, endometrial, myometrial and ovarian). Most of the cases reported to have vulvar, clitoral and pelvic neurofibromas presented as mass lesions. Till date, literature on isolated vulvar neurofibroma is scarce [5]. Among isolated vulvar neurofibromas, the association is found with trauma such as episiotomies or other vulvar injuries [6]. Approximately, half of all vulvar neurofibromas are found in women with neurofibromatosis. Our patient did not have any features of von Recklinghausen's disease.

There are two major concerns in such patients:

  1. How these patients should be evaluated?
  2. How these patients should be followed-up?

Our patient had hypopigmented lesion of vulva which was subsequently diagnosed to have plexiform neurofibroma. According to current nomenclature, such type of lesions is being categorized as non-neoplastic epithelial disorders of skin and mucosa (previously leukoplakia, etc). These lesions are associated with dysplasia and cancer. These lesions do not show significant colposcopic findings and hence the investigation of choice should be tissue diagnosis in such patients. The present case did not have any urinary symptoms so cystoscopy was not performed.

After 12 months of regular follow-up, our patient did not develop any new complains. She did not notice any change in color of the lesion, development of mass in external genital region, inguinal lymphadenopathy. We have planned to keep patient on regular follow-up every 2-3 monthly for external genital and pelvic examination.

Till date no such guidelines have been developed for investigations and management of vulvar neurofibromas. As per available literature, data on malignant transformation is also scarce.


Conclusion

We can conclude from the available literature that for women having hypopigmented lesions of vulva differential diagnosis of neurofibroma should be kept in mind. Systemic examination for the presence of café-au-lait spots should be performed. Also detailed examination of the genitourinary tract including cystoscopy should also be undertaken in such cases. In cases with no mass lesions the rate of growth of the lesion or change in color should be kept in mind for the possible development of malignancy.


References
  1. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS. Surgical Pathology of the Nervous System and Its Covering vol 1, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone 2002:594–611.    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Tamer E, Yalein B, Alli N. Multiple nodular plexiform neurofibromas in a neurofibromatosis 1 family: A familial tendency? A case report and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2003;42(5):357–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Fisher DA, Chu P, McCalmont T. Solitary plexiform neurofibroma is not pathogonomic of Von Recklinghausens neurofibromatosis: A report of a case. Int J Dermatol 1997;36(6):439–2.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Gordon MD, Weilert M, Ireland K. Plexiform neurofibromatosis involving the uterine cervix, endometrium, myometrium and ovary. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(4 Pt 2):699–701.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Haley JC, Mirowski GW, Hood AF. Benign vulval tumours. Semin Cutan Med Surg 1998;17(3):196–204.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Sonnendecker EW, Cohen RJ, Dreyer L, Sher RC, Findlay GH. Neuroma of the vulva. A case report. J Reprod Med 1993;38(1):33–6.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Sunita Arora – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Rupneet Kaur – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Poonam Goel – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
RPS Punia – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2014 Sunita Arora et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.