Case Report
 
Accidental foveal burn following pan retinal photocoagulation and its long-term outcome
Khan Perwez1, Pandey Kankambari2, Khan Lubna3, Saxena Nutan4
1MS Ophthalmology, Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, UP, India
2Junior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, UP, India
3MD Pathology, Associate Professor, Dept. of Pathology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, UP, India
4MS Ophthalmology, Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Rama medical college and research Centre, Kanpur, UP, India

Article ID: Z01201709CR10832KP
doi:10.5348/ijcri-201793-CR-10832

Address correspondence to:
Dr. Perwez Khan
Department of Ophthalmology GSVM Medical College Kanpur-208002
UP, India

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Perwez K, Kankambari P, Lubna K, Nutan S. Accidental foveal burn following pan retinal photocoagulation and its long-term outcome. Int J Case Rep Images 2017;8(9):609–612.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Changing lifestyle has led to rising trend of diabetes and its complications. There is an increased incidence of diabetic retinopathy with subsequent increased use of double frequency Nd:YAG lasers. Knowledge about the consequences of accidental exposure of these lasers and long-term prognosis will help us in better management of such accidents.
Case Report: A 65-year-old female patient who sustained accidental double frequency Nd: YAG laser foveal burn while undergoing left eye panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for diabetic retinopathy is presented with subsequent five years follow-up. Upon initial evaluation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of affected eye was count finger at 1 foot (CF 1’) left eye. Immediate funduscopic examination revealed foveal laser burn. Corticosteroids, in the form of 40 mg prednisolone, were administered orally for two weeks followed by 10 mg per week taper along with long-term topical nepafenac three times a day. Fifteen days after exposure, funduscopic examination revealed a distinct foveal scar followed by epiretinal membrane formation at six months follow-up. The BCVA of the affected eye improved to 20/60 over a period of five years. This clinical course is different from those of previously reported cases where visual acuity did not recover.
Conclusion: Accidental exposure of double frequency Nd:YAG laser to fovea can lead to grievous injury with loss of vision. Prompt use of high dose systemic steroids, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drops and natural healing can have better visual outcome.

Keywords: Double frequency Nd:YAG laser, Foveal burn, Panretinal photocoagulation


INTRODUCTION

Double frequency Nd:YAG laser (532 nm), is a solid state laser which emits green wavelength. It has good absorption in the melanin of retinal pigment epithelium with high absorption in oxyhemoglobin, thereby causing direct closure of microaneurysms. Its propensity for low absorption in xanthophyll reduces risk of neuroretinal damage [1][2].

An increase in the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and other retinal vasculopathies is noted in recent years due to changes in life style and better diagnostic modalities leading to increased use of double frequency Nd:YAG lasers for therapeutic interventions. Hence there is a substantial risk of accidental exposures, whose long-term natural history is uncertain.

Case report of accidental exposure of fovea to frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser burn with subsequent five years follow-up is presented


CASE REPORT

Panretinal photocoagulation was advised in a 65-year-old female having proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with best corrected visual acuity of 20/125 in left eye. It was performed using a double frequency Nd:YAG Laser by a medical trainee in a medical institute. Laser was intended for nasal retina but due to misinterpretation of temporal retina as nasal retina, entire macula including fovea was lasered by high energy burns of 200 milijoules, 150 duration and 500 micrometer spot size. Immediately after the exposure, patient experienced sudden loss of vision in her left eye. Best corrected visual acuity deteriorated to finger counting at 1 foot (CF 1’) or 20/8000. Central scotoma in the affected eye was noted on Amsler grid test. Direct ophthalmoscopy and 90 D biomicroscopy revealed a circular greyish patch over the fovea and laser marks involving whole macula.

Corticosteroids, in the form of 40 mg prednisolone, were administered orally for two weeks followed by 10 mg per week taper along with long-term topical nepafenac three times a day. No improvement was noted in first two weeks.

Funduscopic examination at sixth month follow-up revealed a distinct epiretinal membrane which was confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) revealed multiple circular scar marks suggestive of laser treatment at macula and foveal region (Figure 1).

Follow-up at weekly scheduled visits highlighted that visual recovery in affected eye was 20/200 after two months.

At sixth month funduscopic examination along with an OCT revealed presence of epiretinal membrane and a prominent foveal scar (Figure 2) and visual acuity improved to 20/100.

Subsequent quarterly visual acuity assessment, funduscopic photography and OCT did not reveal significant changes. Four years later, an OCT revealed spontaneous dehiscence of epiretinal membrane along with improvement in patient’s visual acuity of 20/80 (Figure 3). There was continued presence of a foveal scar with central pigmentation on fundus examination. However, neither choroidal neovascularization nor macular hole formation was evident. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved to 20/60 at fifth year follow-up.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed multiple circular scar marks suggestive of laser treatment at macula and foveal region.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Six months later, an optical coherence tomography revealed persistence of the epiretinal membrane and a prominent foveal scar.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 3: Four years later, an optical coherence tomography revealed spontaneous dehiscence of epiretinal membrane along with improvement in patient’s visual acuity of 20/80 OS.


DISCUSSION

Patients of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) have high risk of gross vision loss due to recurrent vitreous hemorrhage and fibro-proliferative changes consequent to neovascularization [3]. The regression of neovascularization achieved by pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) by double frequency Nd:YAG laser reduces risk of vision loss by 50% in comparison to untreated eye [2][3].

New laser modalities, expanding delivery systems, and novel applications of laser energy have vastly expanded our armamentarium for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. This has led to a concomitant increase in laser-induced injuries, particularly ocular injuries as energy focuses on the retina.

The natural history of laser induced foveal injury remains uncertain as such type of injury is uncommon in experienced hands. However, in training institutes such mishaps can occur by trainees especially in the absence of side observer scope, as it was, in the present case. It is not unusual to observe some visual recovery in cases of laser injury in macular area outside central fovea [4][5][6]. However, our patient showed subsequent improvement in visual acuity over a period of five years despite direct injury to the fovea by high intensity PRP laser burn.

Potential benefit of initial systemic corticosteroid or long term topical nepafenac in laser induced foveal injury needs to be substantiated by larger cohort studies [7].

Panretinal photocoagulation is avoided in a small oval area of macula, whose superior and inferior boundaries are formed by the respective arcades, nasal boundary by disc and temporal boundary lies two disc diameter temporal to fovea, as excessive energy of PRP burn is detrimental to its sensitive tissue. It is possible to accidently stray in this area during PRP as only a narrow strip of retina, which is to be lasered, is illuminated. So to avoid this complication one should intermittently refer back to fovea. Foveal burns can be avoided by finding the fixation point by projecting a fluorescein angiogram, using akinesia if cooperation is poor, meticulous technique and experience.

Diabetic macular edema was not noted following laser therapy and no anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) injection was required in the follow-up of last five years. Thus, emphasizing the utility of laser therapy in treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

We concluded that in spite of direct laser injury to fovea, visual acuity may improve significantly in due course of time.

Although surgical intervention is the main modality of treatment for epiretinal membrane, spontaneous dehiscence may occur in long duration leading to improved visual acuity.


CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the importance of deep knowledge and vigorous training before laser can be handled independently. The minimal invasiveness of laser treatment has significant appeal. Nevertheless, complications are possible, but many can be avoided with meticulous technique and experience.


REFERENCES
  1. McMullen WW, Garcia CA. Comparison of retinal photocoagulation using pulsed frequency-doubled neodymium-YAG and argon green laser. Retina 1992;12(3):265–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Brancato R, Bandello F, Trabucchi G, Lattanzio R. Frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser versus argon-green laser photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A preliminary report. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 1991;4:97–102.    Back to citation no. 2
  3. The diabetic retinopathy study research group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of diabetic retinopathy study (DRS) findings, DRS report number 8. Ophthalmology 1981 Jul;88(7):583–600.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Asano T. Accidental YAG laser burn. Am J Ophthalmol 1984 Jul 15;98(1):116–7.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Thach AB, Lopez PF, Snady-McCoy LC, Golub BM, Frambach DA. Accidental Nd:YAG laser injuries to the macula. Am J Ophthalmol 1995 Jun;119(6):767–73.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Lam TT, Tso MO. Retinal injury by neodymium: YAG laser. Retina 1996;16(1):42–6.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Wolfe JA. Laser retinal injury. Mil Med 1985 Apr;150(4):177–85.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Perwez Khan – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Kankambari Pandey – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Lubna Khan – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Nutan Saxena – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2017 Perwez Khan et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.