Case Report
 
Von Meyenburg complexes: An atypical presentation
Nikhil S. Kadle1, Hammad Liaquat2, Saad P. Shaheen II3, Luis S. Marsano4
1Medical Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
2Gastroenterology Fellow, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
3Assistant Gratis Professor of Pathology, University of Louisville Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, General Pathologist and Section Chief of Hematology Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. Robley Rex VA Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
4Professor of Medicine, Jewish Hospital Distinguished Chair in Hepatology, Director of Hepatology, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Article ID: Z01201611CR10715NK
doi:10.5348/ijcri-2016127-CR-10715

Address correspondence to:
Hammad Liaquat
MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine
550 S. Jackson Street (ACB, Room A3L15)
Louisville, Kentucky
USA, 40202

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Kadle NS, Liaquat H, Shaheen II SP, Marsano LS. Von Meyenburg complexes: An atypical presentation. Int J Case Rep Images 2016;7(11):729–732.


Abstract
Introduction: Von Meyenburg complexes are rare, often small multi-nodular cystic lesions which are usually asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed.
Case Report: We present a case of a 74-year-old male whose medical imaging for follow-up on renal cysts led to an unexpected and incidental diagnosis of Von Meyenburg Complexes. There have been reports of development of cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with such lesions.
Conclusion: Von Meyenburg complexes can have atypical presentation and have been associated with hepatobiliary malignancy.

Keywords: Adult polycystic kidney disease, Cholangiocarcinoma, Multi-nodular cystic lesions, Von Meyenburg complexes


Introduction

Von Meyenburg complexes (VMCs) are uncommon, benign cystic dilatations of the intrahepatic bile ducts surrounded by fibrous stroma [1] [2]. Generally, the size of VMCs is less than 15 mm and they are formed due to ductal plate malformations that occur during embryonic development [3]. The diagnosis of such lesions is usually incidental as patients are usually asymptomatic and have normal liver function. We present a case where VMCs were incidentally diagnosed when evaluating renal cysts in a patient.


Case Report

A 74-year-old African-American male presented with difficulty urinating and abdominal pain. During that admission, he was diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic kidney injury and renal ultrasound showed renal cysts up to 3.2 cm on the right and 4.1 cm on the left kidney. Magnetic resonance imaging scan of abdomen with contrast showed innumerable bilateral renal cysts consistent with polycystic renal disease while the images of the liver revealed multiple areas of heterogeneous T2 hyperintensity with diffusion abnormalities.

Subsequently, an MRI triple phase contrast imaging of the liver reported wedge shaped perfusion abnormalities with corresponding hypervascular areas (Figure 1A-B). There was also central linear branching areas of non-enhancement on the portal venous phase of the imaging which were concerning for thrombosis of the small portal vein branches or an infiltrative disease. The patient's liver enzyme levels were normal. Further hypercoagulable and liver serological workup was negative. After consultation between physicians and the patient, it was decided that the bleeding risk associated with anticoagulation was high so such treatment was not given. His renal function recovered to baseline with medical management and he was discharged with plan of outpatient nephrology and gastroenterology (GI) evaluation and management.

The patient was seen in GI clinic where a follow-up CT scan triple phase contrast imaging of the liver (Figure 2) showed patchy, heterogeneous enhancement throughout the arterial phase but no diagnosis was reached. Subsequently, the patient underwent liver biopsy which showed grade 2 mild to moderate inflammatory activity and stage 2 peri-portal fibrosis. Foci of bile duct proliferation within collagenous fibrosis were seen which were consistent with bile duct hamartoma (Von Meyenburg complex) (Figure 3A-C). The patient's liver enzymes remained normal. Subsequent imaging of liver did not show any new pathology. Patient continues to be monitored with ultrasound of liver, liver function laboratory tests as well as follow-up in GI clinic every six months.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Magnetic resonance imaging scan of abdomen with and without contrast – Focal hypervascular areas described as hyper-intense on T2 imaging and bright on diffusion weighted images with persistent nonspecific diffusion abnormalities throughout the liver. (A) T2 weighted MRI image, and (B) Diffusion weighted MRI image.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Computed tomography scan with and without contrast (liver protocol)– Arterial phase consistent with patchy, heterogeneous enhancement throughout the liver.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 3: (A–C) Liver biopsy - Grade 2 mild to moderate peri-portal fibrosis. Foci of fibrosis and bile duct proliferation are consistent with bile duct hamartomas (Von Meyenburg complex). (A) H&E stain, x100, (B) H&E stain, x400, (C) Masson's Trichrome stain, x400.



Discussion

Von Meyenburg complexes (VMCs), or bile duct hamartomas are benign liver lesion that have a prevalence of 0.69–2.8% in the population [4]. VMCs are associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), Caroli disease and congenital hepatic fibrosis [5] [6] [7]. Our patient was diagnosed with ADPKD which has a prevalence 11% in adults with at least one VMC and 40% in those with four or more such lesions in a large study involving autopsies [5]. The same study found the overall prevalence of VMCs in livers on autopsy to be 5.6%.

Von Meyenburg complexes are generally asymptomatic and do not cause liver enzyme abnormalities, although there have been cases where patients have presented initially with abdominal pain [6]. Our patient was asymptomatic at presentation and diagnosis.

An MRI scan is superior to both ultrasound and CT scan to diagnose these lesions where VMCs are often seen as irregular T2 hyperintense cystic nodules throughout the liver without communication of these lesions with the biliary tree [6]. Most VMCs appear with hypointense T1 and hyperintense T2 MRI imaging [2]. Our patient's MRI showed similar though non-specific characteristics of the lesions. However, some sources also note that it can be difficult to definitively diagnose VMCs by MRI as T1-weighted sequences can show both enhancement and no enhancement [6]. The presence of cystic lesions with surrounding fibrous stroma and congested interfaces may account for the variation in appearance [2].

A liver biopsy is required if lesions have atypical characteristics and remain undiagnosed on MRI scan [6]. Since there was concern for an infiltrative process, liver biopsy was performed and definitively diagnosed VMCs in our patient.

There have been reports of development of cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with VMCs [6] [8] [9] . The exposure of the biliary epithelium to chronic cholestasis is thought to lead towards neoplastic transformation. Although there are currently no guidelines for follow-up of patient with VMCs, such patients could be followed per guidelines for patients at risk of cholangiocarcinoma and HCC.


Conclusion

Von Meyenburg complexes (VMCs) are uncommon lesions of the liver. Medical imaging, particularly MRI, is usually diagnostic. Our patient had an atypical presentation of VMCs on MRI and required liver biopsy for diagnosis. Hepatobiliary malignancy has been reported in patients with such liver lesions so regular follow up including medical imaging and liver function tests could be done after VMCs have been diagnosed in a patient.


References
  1. Gong J, Kang W, Xu J. MR imaging and MR Cholangiopancreatography of multiple biliary hamartomas. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2012 Jun;2(2):133–4.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Madhusudhan KS, Das CJ. von Meyenburg's complex in a patient with primary malignancy: Role of MRI. Indian J Surg 2009 Apr;71(2):98–100.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Desmet VJ. Congenital diseases of intrahepatic bile ducts: variations on the theme "ductal plate malformation". Hepatology 1992 Oct;16(4):1069–83.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Thommesen N. Biliary hamartomas (von Meyenburg complexes) in liver needle biopsies. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A 1978 Mar;86(2):93–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Redston MS, Wanless IR. The hepatic von Meyenburg complex: Prevalence and association with hepatic and renal cysts among 2843 autopsies [corrected]. Mod Pathol 1996 Mar;9(3):233–7.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Sinakos E, Papalavrentios L, Chourmouzi D, Dimopoulou D, Drevelegas A, Akriviadis E. The clinical presentation of Von Meyenburg complexes. Hippokratia 2011 Apr;15(2):170–3.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Zen Y, Terahata S, Miyayama S, et al. Multicystic biliary hamartoma: A hitherto undescribed lesion. Hum Pathol 2006 Mar;37(3):339–44.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Lung PF, Jaffer OS, Akbar N, Sidhu PS, Ryan SM. Appearances of von meyenburg complex on cross sectional imaging. J Clin Imaging Sci 2013 May 31;3:22.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Jain D, Sarode VR, Abdul-Karim FW, Homer R, Robert ME. Evidence for the neoplastic transformation of Von-Meyenburg complexes. Am J Surg Pathol 2000 Aug;24(8):1131–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Nikhil S. Kadle – Acquisition and analysis of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Hammad Liaquat – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Saad P. Shaheen II – Acquisition of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Luis S. Marsano – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2016 Nikhil S. Kadle et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.