Clinical Image
 
An unusual case of Erdheim–Chester disease
Guillermo Andres Cortes1, Sara C. Acree2, Helga Van Herle1
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Southern California/Los Angeles County Medical Center.
2Department of Pathology, University of Southern California/Los Angeles County Medical Center.

Article ID: Z01201609CL10102GC
doi:10.5348/ijcri-201609-CL-10102

Address correspondence to:
Helga Van Herle
M.D. M.S, 1510 San Pablo St. Los Angeles
CA. Suite 322

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Cortes GA, Acree SC, Herle HV. An unusual case of Erdheim–Chester disease. Int J Case Rep Images 2016;7(9):606–611.


Case Report

A 29-year-old female with a two-year history of central diabetes insipidus and hypothyroidism presented with progressive diffuse abdominal pain. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen (Figure 1) revealed diffuse infiltrative disease likely fibrosis. Her abdominal pain worsened over time and she underwent an exploratory laparotomy, which revealed an extensive process resembling severe fibromatosis versus carcinomatosis. Due to marked inflammation surrounding the appendix and right ovary, the patient underwent appendectomy and right oophorectomy. In addition, multiple biopsies were taken of the peritoneum and omentum (Figure 2A-B). The pathologic diagnosis was reported as a fibrohistiocytic process.

The patient's postoperative course was complicated by bilateral hydronephrosis. Cystoscopy and ureteroscopy with bilateral ureteral stent placement was performed with no improvement. Ultimately required bilateral nephrostomy tube placement; renal function continued to deteriorate and she was started on hemodialysis. Shortly thereafter, she developed a deep venous thrombosis of the left upper extremity and anticoagulation with warfarin was instituted. At the same time, the patient developed severe abdominal pain. A CT scan of the abdomen revealed a large bowel obstruction requiring surgical intervention with partial colectomy and colostomy. The patient was subsequently transferred to our institution for further evaluation and higher level care.

Two weeks after anticoagulation was started, the patient developed bleeding from the colostomy site. However, she remained hemodynamically stable. The gastroenterology service evaluated the patient and determined that the risk of perforation from an EGD and colonoscopy to find the source of bleeding or from performing a new biopsy was significantly high. It was further determined that the site of bleeding was at the colostomy stoma. As the patient's primary diagnosis remained unclear and CT images were reviewed. A mass at the inferior vena cava right atrium was identified (Figure 3).

The initial transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated a dimension 2.5x2.4 cm, non-mobile mass, extending almost from the entrance of the IVC to the posterolateral wall of the right atrium (Figure 4). An MRI scan was attempted however, patient, did not tolerate the study and it was aborted, the few images captured did demonstrate evidence of the mass (Figure 6). A cardiac CT scan allowed us to have a better visualization of the mass. It was found to be 3.9x3.8 cm in dimension, intraluminal within the right atrium, centered on the crista terminalis and infiltrating into the right atrial-ventricular groove and the intra-atrial septum (Figure 5). A cardiac biopsy was performed and revealed a process not unlike what was seen in the abdomen. This tumor was comprised of bland-appearing fibroblast like cells characterized as medium-sized, with oval to stellate nuclei, fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and ample amphophilic to eosinophilic cytoplasm with indistinct cell borders. These cells were scattered within a myxoid to histiocytic background. Like the intra-abdominal tumor, these cells were immunoreactive for CD68 and CD163 (Figure 2) and (Figure 7). These histologic findings, combined with the clinical presentation, was most consistent with non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, otherwise known as Erdheim–Chester disease. Bone scan was performed and no evidence of osteosclerosis or infiltrative disease was found (Figure 8).

The patient's clinical course had been most complicated by the aggressive peritoneal and retroperitoneal proliferation, which had caused bowel obstruction and ureteral obstruction, with hydronephrosis and renal failure, and cardiovascular infiltrating mass extending from IVC into the right atrium with no hemodynamic compromise. However, after initiation of therapy with Anakinra, a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist; she showed a dramatic clinical improvement. Ultimately, the patient responded well to therapy and was send home with plan to follow as outpatient.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Abdominal CT: Diffuse peritoneal infiltrative process likely fibrosis vs carcinomatosis.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Peritoneum, biopsy: (A) The extensive fibrohistiocytic process extended into the peritoneum where frank xanthomatous histiocytes were seen. These lipidized cells are often seen in older or longstanding lesions. Immunostains for CD68 and CD163 confirm the histiocytic nature to the proliferation (B) Within the peritoneum, there were foci showing classic Touton-type giant cells. This finding was a key feature supporting the diagnosis.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 3: Abdominal CT (view of IVC and Right atrium): 3.4x 3.3 cm mass extending from IVC into right atrium towards the atrial septum.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 4: TTE: 2.5x2.4 cm non mobile, heterogeneous mass in the right atrium with tiny filamentous. The mass is attached to the posterolateral wall of the atrium near the entrance of the IVC.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 5: Cardiac computed scan demonstrates: 3.9x3.8 cm intraluminal mass within the right atrium centered on the crista terminalis that infiltrates into the right atrial-ventricular groove and the intra-atrial septum. The mass contains fat attenuation, mildly heterogeneously enhancing soft tissue and peripheral punctuate calcifications. The sinoatrial nodal artery courses within the superior.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 6: Cardiac MRI scan demonstrates right atrial mass measuring 3.8 cm.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 7: Cardiac biopsy showing bland-appearing fibroblast-like cells characterized as medium-sized, with oval to stellate nuclei, fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and ample amphophilic to eosinophilic cytoplasm with indistinct cell borders. These cells were scattered within a myxoid to histiocytic background. Cells were immunoreactive for CD68 and CD163



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 8: Bone scan: No randomly distributed foci of increased activity to suggest metastatic disease. Symmetric, diffuse activity in the skull is noted, due to hyperostosis. The axial and appendicular skeleton demonstrate diffuse increased uptake with no focal lesions. Diffuse, symmetric, relatively extensive soft tissue uptake is also noted, corresponding to the anasarca. Physiologic renal activity is seen and noted to drain into the bilateral nephrostomy tubes.


Discussion

Jakob Erdheim and William Chester first described the "Über Lipoidgranulomatose" in 1930 [1]. The term "Erdheim–Chester disease" (ECD), however, was first used by Elaine Jaffe (1972) [2] [3]. Erdheim–Chester disease is a rare, non-Langerhans form of histiocytosis [2] [4][5] [6][7]. It is an adult variant of the disseminated juvenile xanthogranulomatosis, characterized by a proliferation and multiorgan infiltration of histiocytes [1]. Histologically, this disorder is characterized by a relatively bland-appearing epithelioid to spindle cell proliferation often with a foamy (xanthomatous) component, especially in older lesions, and variably-prominent multinucleated Touton-type giant cells (xanthogranulomatous). This histiocytic proliferation is positive for histiocytic markers, such as CD68 and CD163, and negative for CD1a and Langerin [2] [4][6][8]. In most cases (80%), staining for S-100 protein is also negative [2][4] [5][6][9][10].

Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) must be distinguished from Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), which includes three subtypes, the unifocal eosinophilic granuloma, the multifocal unisystem Hand-Schuller–Christian disease and the multifocal, multisystem Letterer-Siwe disease. Classically, LCH presents with asymmetric lytic lesions of flat bones, whereas ECD is associated with bilateral, symmetric diffuse metaphyseal and diaphyseal cortical osteosclerosis of long tubular bones of the appendicular skeleton with sparing of the epiphyses [7] [11]. Immunohistological, LCH stains positive for S-100 protein, CD1a and Langerin. Electron microscopy reveals the characteristic "tennis-racket" cytoplasmic organelles called Birbeck granules, also known as X bodies, whose function is not entirely known [5] [7]. In contrast, ECD is negative for CD1a and Langerin and does not have these ultra-structural findings. Therefore, ECD is classified as a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Evans et al. have called it "polyostotic sclerosing hystiocytosis" [11].

Clinical features of ECD range from asymptomatic presentation to extensive multiorgan infiltration and death [2][4][5][10]. Bone pain is the most common manifestation, seen in up to 50% of the cases. More than half of the patients with ECD have extra skeletal involvement, including neurological (exophthalmos, gaze disturbances, ataxia), diabetes insipidus, hypogonadism, hypopituitarism from hypothalamic infiltration, retroperitoneal involvement (renal failure, hydronephrosis, nephrovascular hypertension), dyspnea (lung and pleural involvement), cutaneous manifestations (xanthoma, xanthelasma) and cardiovascular involvement, (seen in up to 60% of cases [1] [2][4][5][6][8] [10][11][12].

Haroche et al. were the first to look at the cardiovascular involvement in ECD. In 2004, they published a literature review that concluded significant underestimation in the extent of cardiac involvement. Of the 178 cases of ECD reviewed, 72 cases had CV involvement: 56% had periaortic fibrosis and 28% presented with fibrosis of the aorta (coated aorta) [2] [13]. Direct heart involvement was found in 54 cases; this involvement included pericardial infiltration (44%), myocardial infiltration (31%), valvular heart disease (8%), a right atrial tumor (8%). Heart failure was seen in 19 cases with death resulting in eight cases; myocardial infarction occurred in six cases including two deaths. Cardiovascular complications were responsible for the death in 31.4% of the cases [2] [10], confirming the poor prognosis of patients with CV involvement in ECD [2][4][5] [6][10][13]. In 2009, Haroche et al. report the evaluation of 37 patients with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scan and computer tomography. Of these, 26 patients (70%), had abnormalities including direct infiltration of right heart (49%), infiltration of the left coronary artery (27%), pericardial effusion (24%), and pericardial thickening (14%) [8].

In recent years, B-Raf V600 mutations have been described in various malignancies, including melanoma, colorectal and thyroid carcinomas, hairy cell leukemia, and histiocytosis. In the latter group, which includes both Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis, this mutation has been identified in roughly half the cases [9]. B-Raf is a member of the Raf kinase family of growth signal transduction protein kinases and plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERKs signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Testing for this mutation has become critical with the availability of vemurafenib, which stands for "V600E mutated BRAF inhibition". As an inhibitor of mutated BRAF, vemurafenib interrupts the B-Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, and it was initially FDA-approved for the treatment of late-stage melanoma. More recently, however, it has been shown to be effective in the treatment of histiocytoses [14]. This patient was tested for the BRAF mutation, but because she was negative, she was not treated with vemurafenib, but instead with anakinra. Anakinra is a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist and appears over-stimulated in ECD. IL-1 receptor antagonist synthesis is naturally induced after stimulation of IFN-alpha, which has been shown to be increased in ECD [15].


Conclusion

In summary, Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is multisystem infiltrative disease of histiocytic origin. It is imperative to screen patient with ECD for possible cardiovascular involvement as was seen in this patient, as cardiac involvement denotes a much more aggressive form of this disorder. Cardiac MRI and CT scans are valuable complements to echocardiography for visualization and characterization of cardiac and pericardial structures in order to direct the most appropriate therapy. Still is unclear if the treatment affects the overall course of the patients with cardiovascular involvement of ECD.


Keywords: Erdheim-Chester Disease, Aggressive fibromatosis, Disseminated juvenile xanthogranuloma


References
  1. Chester W. Über lipoidgranulomatose. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat 1930;279:561–602.    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Haroche J, Amoura Z, Dion E, et al. Cardiovascular involvement, an overlooked feature of Erdheim-Chester disease: report of 6 new cases and a literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004 Nov;83(6):371–92.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Jaffe HL. Gaucher's disease and certain other inborn metabolic disorders: Lipid (cholesterol) granulomatosis. In: Jaffe HL ed. Metabolic, degenerative and inflammatory diseases of bones and joints. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1972. p. 535.    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Haroche J, Amoura Z, Trad SG, et al. Variability in the efficacy of interferon-alpha in Erdheim-Chester disease by patient and site of involvement: results in eight patients. Arthritis Rheum 2006 Oct;54(10):3330–6.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Cavalli G, Guglielmi B, Berti A, Campochiaro C, Sabbadini MG, Dagna L. The multifaceted clinical presentations and manifestations of Erdheim-Chester disease: comprehensive review of the literature and of 10 new cases. Ann Rheum Dis 2013 Oct;72(10):1691–5.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Veyssier-Belot C, Cacoub P, Caparros-Lefebvre D, et al. Erdheim-Chester disease. Clinical and radiologic characteristics of 59 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1996 May;75(3):157–69.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Haroche J, Cluzel P, Toledano D, Cardiac involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: magnetic resonance and computed tomographic scan imaging in a monocentric series of 37 patients. Circulation 2009 Jun 30;119(25):e597–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Haroche J, Charlotte F, Arnaud L, et al. High prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease but not in other non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses. Blood 2012 Sep 27;120(13):2700–3.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Haroche J, Arnaud L, Amoura Z. Erdheim-Chester disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2012 Jan;24(1):53–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10
  11. Evans S, Williams F. Erdheim-Chester disease: polyostotic sclerosing histiocytosis. Clin Radiol 1986 Jan;37(1):93–6.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 11
  12. Merli E, Savelli F, Lovato L, Zompatori M. Cardiac involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: echocardiographic appearance and value of cardiac MRI. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012 Feb;13(2):198.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 12
  13. Serratrice J, Granel B, De Roux C, et al. "Coated aorta": a new sign of Erdheim-Chester disease. J Rheumatol 2000 Jun;27(6):1550–3.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 13
  14. Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Emile JF, et al. Dramatic efficacy of vemurafenib in both multisystemic and refractory Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis harboring the BRAF V600E mutation. Blood 2013 Feb 28;121(9):1495–500.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 14
  15. Aouba A, Georgin-Lavialle S, Pagnoux C, et al. Rationale and efficacy of interleukin-1 targeting in Erdheim-Chester disease. Blood 2010 Nov 18;116(20):4070–6.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 15
[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Guillermo Andres Cortes – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Sara C. Acree – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Helga Van Herle – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2016 Waqas Jehangir et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.