Case Report
 
Massive chylous ascites following an elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: A case report
Al-Khusheh M.1, Blach O.1, Button M.1
1Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals.

Article ID: Z01201604CR10636AM
doi:10.5348/ijcri-201648-CR-10636

Address correspondence to:
Mr Moutaz Al-Khusheh
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals
Eastern Road
Brighton, BN2 5BE

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Al-Khusheh M, Blach O, Button M. Massive chylous ascites following an elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: A case report. Int J Case Rep Imag 2016;7(4):278–281.


Abstract
Introduction: Symptomatic postoperative chyloperitoneum is a rarely reported complication of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery (AAA). Treatment, conservative versus invasive, could be challenging.
Case Report: We present a case of severe chyloperitoneum following seemingly uncomplicated elective repair of an 8 cm infra-renal AAA, in a 69-year-old male. Patient presented with a progressively increasing abdominal distension and small amount of milky white discharge around the transverse incision wound three weeks postoperatively. We discuss the diagnostic process, different management strategies attempted and outcome in light of the existing literature and our own experience.
Conclusion: While an adequate trial of conservative measures should precede any surgical intervention, our case report shows that early consideration of peritoneovenous shunt insertion for refractory chyloperitoneum provides excellent and sustained results.

Keywords: Aortic aneurysm, Chylous, Chyloperitoneum, Peritoneovenous shunt


Introduction

Chylous ascites is a rare complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery with a few cases reported in literature. Due to their anatomical relation with the abdominal aorta, cisterna chyli injury is more common following open AAA repairs when compared to other surgeries.

We present a case of severe chylous ascites following elective AAA repair in a 69-year-old male who gradually developed abdominal distension following discharge from hospital. A conservative approach was followed by a successful peritoneovenous shunt insertion. This less invasive treatment avoided the patient having relaparotomy and ligation of leaking lymphatic vessel.


Case Report

A 69-year-old male presented three weeks post-seemingly uncomplicated elective open repair of an 8-cm infra-renal AAA, with progressively increasing abdominal distension and small amount of milky white discharge around the transverse incision wound. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showed minor fatty stranding around the aneurysm sac suspicious of graft infection, treated with a course of tazocin and teicoplanin, a superficial abdominal wall collection and extensive ascites (Figure 1). The collection was drained.

Blood tests were grossly normal, except for hypoalbuminemia. An ascitic tap showed fluid triglycerides level of 36.4 mmol/L (3224.1 mg/dL), confirming a diagnosis of chylous ascites. No dietary changes were recommended by the dietician and the patient was discharged with an outpatient follow-up.

The patient was then re-admitted a month later for USS guided drainage of the worsening abdominal chyle collection; 20.7 liters of chyle were drained in total and a drain was left in situ. He was put on a high protein/medium TAG diet and advised to reduce oral fat intake. Patient was then discharged home. However, here-presented within two weeks with dyspnea, decreased drain output, abdominal distension and CT scan showed re-accumulation of ascites (Figure 2). Further four liters of chyle were drained under USS guidance. In view of the chylous ascites refractory to conservative treatment, and to avoid major operation which has considerable risks to this patient with high body mass index (BMI) and several comorbidities, a peritoneovenous shunt was inserted, with no further complications or re-accumulation of ascites, and no need for lymphangiography or re-operation, result sustained 6 months later, where patient was asymptomatic at the follow-up clinic and ultrasound scan showed no reaccumulation of the ascites.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen three weeks postoperatively showing subcutaneous abdominal wall collection and ascites.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen six weeks postoperatively showing reaccumulation of ascites in spite of the per-cutaneous drainage.



Discussion

In the context of abdominal aortic surgery, injury to the lymphatic trunk with a subsequent lymphatic leak usually follows extensive retroperitoneal space dissection, such as during repair of ruptured or inflammatory aneurysms [1] [2][3]. Although not an uncommon complication, it rarely leads to symptomatic chyloperitoneum or chylous ascites, with fewer than 50 cases reported in the last 50 years [4].

Presentation varies based on the severity of the chyle leak, from progressive abdominal distension, pressure-related dyspnea, to widespread edema and paralytic ileus [1] [4]. However, in the majority of cases, the diagnosis is not suspected until diagnostic paracentesis is performed [5], yielding milky-white peritoneal fluid rich in triglycerides (>200 mg/dL) [6].

There is no agreed protocol for the treatment of chylous ascites following AAA surgery. Conservative management, combining a low-fat diet, medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) regime and parenteral nutrition (TPN), is frequently advocated following initial diagnosis [1] [3][5][7], and is believed to promote healing by minimizing the lymphatic flow from the leaking duct [8]. Up to 80% of chylous ascites, reportedly, dry out with such approach [1] [4], and some feel that surgical intervention is only warranted after 4–6 weeks of persistent ascites [1] [9].

Insertion of a peritoneovenous shunt and suture ligation of the fistulae are two available surgical options [10]. Both carry a significant complications rate, however peritoneovenous shunt insertion is the less invasive procedure and more appropriate in patients who are unfit to undergo re-laparotomy with ligation of the leaking lymphatic vessel [4].

Favorable outcome depends on timely diagnosis and identification of the underlying pathology. The treatment of chylous ascites should therefore be selective and tailored to the severity of patient's condition [11]. While an adequate trial of conservative measures should precede any surgical intervention, our case report shows that early consideration of peritoneovenous shunt insertion for refractory chyloperitoneum provides excellent and sustained results.


Conclusion

Chylous ascites is rare after aortic surgery and manifests itself about two weeks after operation, at times after discharge from hospital. It has an indolent course, but may resolve spontaneously up to two months after operation. Its course appears not to be foreshortened by diet, including omission of fat, but can be successfully treated surgically with a peritoneovenous shunt. If done early, a protracted hospital course may be avoided.


References
  1. Combe J, Buniet JM, Douge C, Bernard Y, Camelot G. Chylothorax and chylous ascites following surgery of an inflammatory aortic aneurysm. Case report with review of the literature. [Article in French]. J Mal Vasc 1992;17(2):151–6.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Müns G, Rennard SI, Floreani AA. Combined occurrence of chyloperitoneum and chylothorax after retroperitoneal surgery. Eur Respir J 1995 Jan;8(1):185–7.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Fariña LA, Martínez MC. Chylous ascites following radical nephrectomy. Conservative management whithout paracentesis. [Article in Spanish]. Actas Urol Esp 2009 Jun;33(6):703–5.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Barakat HM, Shahin Y, McCollum P. Chylous ascites complicating elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: case report and review of treatment options. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012 Nov;46(8):682–5.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Browse NL, Wilson NM, Russo F, al-Hassan H, Allen DR. Aetiology and treatment of chylous ascites. Br J Surg 1992 Nov;79(11):1145–50.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Jüngst D, Gerbes AL, Martin R, Paumgartner G. Value of ascitic lipids in the differentiation between cirrhotic and malignant ascites. Hepatology 1986 Mar-Apr;6(2):239–43.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Parthenis DG, Paraskevas KI, Staramos D, Spathi E, Georgopoulos DS. Spontaneous healing of chylous ascites after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasa 2003 Nov;32(4):215–7.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Busch T, Lotfi S, Sirbu H, Dalichau H. Chyloperitoneum: a rare complication after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2000 Mar;14(2):174–5.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Pabst TS 3rd, McIntyre KE Jr, Schilling JD, Hunter GC, Bernhard VM. Management of chyloperitoneum after abdominal aortic surgery. Am J Surg 1993 Aug;166(2):194–8; discussion 198–9   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Onnitsev IE, Khokhlov AV. Surgical treatment of chyloperitoneum. [Article in Russian]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 2009;168(3):44–7.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10
  11. Leibovitch I, Mor Y, Golomb J, Ramon J. The diagnosis and management of postoperative chylous ascites. J Urol 2002 Feb;167(2 Pt 1):449–57.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 11

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Moutaz Alkhusheh – Substantial contribution to conception and design, Revising the article critically for important intellectual content, Final approval to the version be published
Olga Blach – Substantial contribution to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval to the version be published
Matthew Button – Substantial contribution to conception and design, Revising the article critically for important intellectual content, Final approval to the version be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2016 Moutaz Alkhusheh et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.