![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Report
| ||||||
Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) for the patients with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis | ||||||
Takashi Kawahara1, Hiroki Ito1,2, Hideyuki Terao2, Hiroji Uemura1, Masahiro Yao1, Junichi Matsuzaki2 | ||||||
1Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
2Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. | ||||||
| ||||||
[HTML Full Text]
[PDF Full Text]
[Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar] ![]() |
How to cite this article |
Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Uemura H, Yao M, Matsuzaki J. Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) for the patients with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis. Int J Case Rep Images 2015;6(12):778–780. |
Abstract
|
Introduction:
Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) makes it is possible to continuously visualize dilation of the ureter from the site of puncture to insertion of the nephroaccess sheath, with minimal complications and effective for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL).
Case Report: A 43-year-old male with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) was referred to our department to undergo PCNL for a diagnosis of a right kidney stone. In July 2012, the patient was admitted to our department for PCNL to treat a right renal staghorn calculus. We performed PCNL using the technique of UARN. The operative time was 195 minutes, and the chemical composition of the stone was calcium oxalate. Conclusion: UARN is effective for the case who have large renal stone with complications of CTX. | |
Keywords:
Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), Renal stone, Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN), Ureteroscopy
|
[HTML Full Text]
[PDF Full Text]
|
Author Contributions
Takashi Kawahara – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Hiroki Ito – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Hideyuki Terao – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Hiroji Uemura – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Masahiro Yao – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Junichi Matsuzaki – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published |
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission. |
Source of support
None |
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest. |
Copyright
© 2015 Takashi Kawahara et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information. |
|