Case Report
 
Breast cancer in association with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: An unexpected discovery
Roisin M. Heaney1, Patricia Cronin1, Maurice Stokes1
1Breast Health, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-2015123-CR-10584

Address correspondence to:
Roisin M. Heaney
Breast Health, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Eccles Street, Dublin 7
Ireland
Phone: 3531 803 2560
Fax: 3531 8032369

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Breast cancer in association with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: An unexpected discovery


Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are independently, relatively common entities. However, the development of cancer in the presence of a shunt catheter is a rare occurrence.
Case Report: A 75-year-old female presented with multifocal invasive lobular carcinoma in association with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The patient did not include insertion of a VP shunt in her medical history during the initial consultation and this in conjunction with the absence of the shunt catheter on preoperative imaging resulted in the unexpected discovery of the VP shunt adjacent to the tumour intra-operatively. Meticulous dissection allowed for preservation of the VP shunt and the patient had an unremarkable recovery.
Conclusion: Preoperatively, a thorough history is essential for the safe provision of patient care. Neurosurgeons must give due consideration to the possibility of future oncological breast surgery when planning insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Keywords: Breast, Cancer, Mastectomy, Ventriculoperitoneal shunt


Introduction

Breast cancer is an increasingly common phenomenon worldwide. In Ireland, 1 in 9 women developing the disease throughout their lifetimes [1]. Insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is the primary treatment for adult and paediatric hydrocephalus [2][3] and remains one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures [4]. While these are two relatively common entities, the occurrence of breast cancer in the presence of a VP shunt is a very rare event. To date only five cases have been documented in literature.


Case Report

A 75-year-old female was referred to a symptomatic breast clinic with a three-month history of right sided mastalgia. Her past medical history was notable for hypertension, obesity, atrial fibrillation and an intracerebral hemorrhage nine years previously. Risk factors for breast cancer included advanced age and late menopause. Clinical examination was unremarkable and a VP shunt was not palpable. Mammography, however, revealed two small areas of calcification in the right breast, one at the 3 o'clock and the other at the 12 o'clock position, as well as an area of calcification in the left breast. An ultrasound guided biopsy was performed and histology revealed invasive lobular carcinoma at both sites in the right breast and high grade DCIS in the left breast. The VP shunt was not visualized on mammogram or ultrasound (Figure 1). Following discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting, she proceeded to bilateral mastectomy and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Intraoperatively, the VP shunt was encountered unexpectedly deep in the right breast, five centimetres from the midline (Figure 2). Meticulous dissection ensued, particularly at the site of the known tumor in the 3 o'clock position. The VP shunt was preserved and specimen sent for histology. The patient remained on IV antibiotics until the drains were removed due to the presence of the VP shunt. Medical records were obtained from another hospital which revealed the patient had undergone insertion of a VP shunt for relief of hydrocephalus secondary to the intracerebral hemorrhage. Final histology revealed diffuse DCIS in the left breast and two invasive grade 2 ER/PR + lobular carcinomas in the right breast. The cancer in the 3 o' clock position was 2 cm in size and present within 1.4 mm of the deep resection margin. The right SLN biopsy was positive for micrometastases. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course and underwent four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel). She was well with no signs of recurrence six months postoperatively and was commenced on hormonal therapy.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Absence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter on mammography.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: Discovery of the shunt catheter 5 cm from the midline. [left = cephalad, right = caudal]



Discussion

Breast related VP shunt complications including; shunt migration, CSF pseudocyst, CSF 'galactorrhea' and shunt obstruction, are well documented in literature and represent a class of thoracic shunt complications [5]. To date however, only five cases of breast cancer adjacent to a ventriculoperitoneal shunt have been described. The most recent case reports on a 74-year-old patient with invasive ductal carcinoma encasing a VP shunt which, despite surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, recurred on two occasions. The patient declined any further treatment or replacement of the shunt upon diagnosis of the latest recurrence [6]. Jain et al. described the case of a 67-year-old woman with a screen detected invasive carcinoma encircling a VP shunt which had been inserted following excision of an ependymoma. The VP shunt in this case had to be rerouted by the neurosurgeons during the wide local excision [7]. The third case describes a 70-year-old female who presented with neurological symptoms secondary to extrinsic VP shunt compression by a large breast mass. Intraoperatively, there was no identifiable flow distal to the breast mass and she underwent a modified radical mastectomy with relocation of the VP catheter [8]. The fourth case from New York reports an 88-year-old patient with advanced dementia with multicentric invasive lobular carcinoma. The presence of the VP shunt was only identified following review of her medical notes. While a mastectomy was indicated, a decision to excise only the mass around the VP catheter was made based on the patients multiple comorbidities and poor premorbid status [9]. The earliest documented case in 2001 involved a 52-year-old who underwent a modified radical mastectomy for a 5 cm invasive carcinoma. Review of her medical notes revealed insertion of a VP shunt for hydrocephalus secondary to an acoustic neuroma 5 years previously. Intraoperatively, the shunt was identified 5 cm from the midline inside the mastectomy incision [10].

Extreme care and preoperative planning is essential in the management of invasive breast carcinoma involving a VP shunt. In many cases, identifying the presence of a VP shunt may be difficult due to patient factors (dementia, forgetfulness, etc.) or incomplete medical notes. Failure to identify its presence can be further confounded by its apparent absence on imaging studies, as happened in our case. Care must be taken to avoid iatrogenic injury to the VP catheter during investigation and work up of the cancer (fine needle aspiration or core biopsy) as well as definitive management of the tumour. The location of the shunt in relation to the tumour may preclude certain types of surgery or may require involvement of the neurosurgical team for relocation of the shunt as happened in cases two and three described above [7] [8]. The possibility of seeding of tumor cells on the shunt catheter surface was raised by Copeland-Halperin et al. as their patient developed multiple recurrences despite adequate therapy [6]. When planning insertion of a VP shunt, neurosurgeons must give due consideration to the possibility of future oncological breast surgery and site the catheter accordingly [10].

Our case highlighted the importance of obtaining a patient's medical history as well as reviewing their medical notes preoperatively. Without knowledge of its existence, no neurosurgical opinion was sought perioperatively. Meticulous dissection allowed for removal of the breast tissue and preservation of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter.


Conclusion

We report the case of a 75-year-old patient with invasive lobular carcinoma in which a ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter was discovered adjacent to the tumour intraoperatively. Our case emphasises the importance of reviewing the patient's medical history on the morning of surgery. In addition to this, neurosurgical team should be conscious of the position of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt in female patients, taking into account the increasing incidence of breast cancer and the possible requirement of future oncological surgery.


References
  1. Cancer in Ireland 2013: annual report of the National Cancer Registry. National Cancer Registry, Cork Ireland. 2013. [Available at: http://www.ncri.ie/publications/statistical-reports/cancer-ireland-2013-annual-report-national-cancer-registry]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Pudenz RH. The surgical treatment of hydrocephalus--an historical review. Surg Neurol 1981 Jan;15(1):15–26.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Reddy GK, Bollam P, Shi R, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. Management of adult hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: long-term single-institution experience. Neurosurgery 2011 Oct;69(4):774–80; discussion 780–1.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Patwardhan RV, Nanda A. Implanted ventricular shunts in the United States: the billion-dollar-a-year cost of hydrocephalus treatment. Neurosurgery 2005;56(1):139–44; discussion 144–5.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Schrot RJ, Ramos-Boudreau C, Boggan JE. Breast-related CSF shunt complications: literature review with illustrative case. Breast J 2012 Sep;18(5):479–83.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Copeland-Halperin LR, Cohen RA. Recurrent breast cancer in a patient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Case Rep Surg 2015;2015:659395.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Jain YK, Kokan JS. An interesting case of screen-detected breast cancer encasing a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. BMJ Case Rep 2013 Jan 23;2013. pii: bcr2012007894.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Roka YB, Gupta R, Bajracharya A. Unusual cause for ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure: carcinoma breast compressing distal catheter. Neurol India 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):662–4.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Lee D, Cutler B, Roberts S, Manghisi S, Ma AM. Multi-centric breast cancer involving a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Breast J 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):653–5.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Keshtgar MR, Ahmed AR, Baum M. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt and breast carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001 Jul;83(4):281–2.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Roisin M. Heaney – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Patricia Cronin – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Maurice Stokes – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2015 Roisin M. Heaney et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.