Editorial
 
Cancer survivorship care: Where are we going?
Shekhar Gogna1, Priya Goyal2, Prateek Thakur2, Animesh Raj3
1Assistant professor, Department of surgery, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India.
2SeniorResident Department of surgery, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India.
3Junior Resident Department of surgery, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-201507-ED-10007

Address correspondence to:
Shekhar Gogna
478- GF, Omaxe city, Rohtak City,
Haryana
India 124001
Phone: +919896379623

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Gogna S, Goyal P, Thakur P, RAj A. Cancer survivorship care: Where are we going? Int J Case Rep Images 2015;5:539–541.


Introduction

A cancer survivor is an individual who has been diagnosed with cancer, regardless of when that diagnosis was received and is still living [1]. Considering the diagnosis, response to treatment, morbidity and mortality of disease there are three distinct phases associated with cancer survival :

  1. The time from diagnosis to treatment
  2. Transition from treatment to immediate survival
  3. Long-term survival [2].

Over the past 25 years, the number of cancer survivors has increased from three million to nearly twelve million due to progress in the treatment of cancer. However, advanced treatment has often failed to provide survivors with care that address the side effects of both cancer and its treatment, which have a significant effect on their quality of life. American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) has identified biggest hurdle in care of cancer survivors, which is unassisted transition from an orderly system of hospital based care to a "non-system" in which there are no guidelines to assist them through the next stage of their life or help them overcome the medical and psychosocial problems [3]. This observation is true worldwide.

Evolution of cancer survivor care

In 1986, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) was formed with a goal to change the perception of cancer victim to survivor. This society stressed the need to include family, friends, and caregivers. National Cancer Institute established the Office of Cancer Survivorship in 1996 with the main objective to support research in cancer care. This office aimed to understand the physical, psychological, economic issues and attempted to increase the quality of life of survivors. It also intended to provide education to healthcare professionals and survivors about health related issues [4]. The Institutes of Medicine (IOM) published two subsequent reports on care of cancer survivors in 2006. Both reports recommended that survivors should get a detailed care plan to assess and treat the potential long-term effects due to cancer and its treatment. These reports also identified primary care providers as partners in the care of cancer survivors [5]. Table 1 shows the brief summary of 10 recommendations passed in the IOM meeting. National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center was formed in 2010, with collaboration between the American Cancer Society and the George Washington University Cancer Institute, and is funded through a cooperative agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This center identified 10 cancer sites based on survivor prevalence and the severity of long-term or late effects These 10 cancer sites were colorectal, prostate, lung, breast, cervix, ovarian, endometrial, uterine, melanoma and head and neck cancers [6]. This office has also recommended to strengthen and follow 2006 IOM guidelines as outlined in Table 1.

Where are the evidence based guidelines for healthcare workers
National comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) is a pioneer society in establishing and publishing evidence based guidelines for treatment site and stage specific cancer. The NCCN publishes and updates survivorship guidelines based on expert panel recommendations it incorporates steps that are related to late effects of cancer which are mostly neurocognitive such as anxiety, depression, cognitive function, fatigue, sleep disorders, chronic pain, and sexual function [7]. The complaint specific guidelines are also available such as pain, emesis, infections and regular surveillance. American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) also publishes and regularly updates guidelines that focus on providing guidance for the management of long-term and late effects such as chemotherapy related neuropathy, deep vein thrombosis, mental symptoms such as stress depression, fatigue. ASCO has previously published and now updated follow-up guidelines for patients with prostate, breast colorectal cancer.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Life before and after esophagectomy for cancer esophagus. Survivors do improve if we commit on them.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Table 1: Institutes of Medicine (IOM) recommendations



Conclusion

The Institutes of Medicine (IOM) report identified four essential components of survivorship care: prevention, surveillance, intervention, and coordination. Cancer care is continuously evolving process. Oncologist and primary care physicians both hold the equally important positions in the life of cancer survivor. The goal of cancer survivorship is to empower survivors and their families. Cancer survivors should be given detailed follow up plan after primary treatment for better improvement in their quality of life.

Keywords: Cancer care, Cancer survivorship, Guidelines


Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution of Sr Prof. Dr R.K Karwasra (HOD Surgical oncology PGIMS Rohtak) & Prof Sanjeev Parshad for bringing this important topic into our minds and conceptualizing it.


References
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Cancer survivor-ship. Retrieved May 23, 2009. [Availabe at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivorship/basic_info]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Mullan F. Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med 1985 Jul 25;313(4):270–3.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Freyer DR. Transition of care for young adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: rationale and approaches. J Clin Oncol 2010 Nov 10;28(32):4810–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Rowland JH, Aziz N, Tesauro G, Feuer EJ. The changing face of cancer survivorship. Semin Oncol Nurs 2001 Nov;17(4):236–40.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Brawley O, Byers T, Chen A, et al. New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA 2011 Dec 14;306(22):2495–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2014. [Availabe at: http://jco.ascopubs.org/site/misc/specialarticles.xhtml]    Back to citation no. 7

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions:
Shekhar Gogna – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Priya Goyal – Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Prateek Thakur – Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Animesh Raj – Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2015 Shekhar Gogna et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.