Case Report
 
Polycythemia vera and microvascular dysfunction in a 26-year-old male presenting with chest pain
Erika Jones1, Nava Greenfield2, Puja K. Mehta1, Chrisandra Shufelt1, Louise Thomson3, C. Noel Bairey Merz1
1MD, Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
2MD, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
3MBChB, FRACP, S. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-201550-CR-10511

Address correspondence to:
C. Noel Bairey Merz
MD, FACC, FAHA, Women's Guild Endowed Chair in Women's Health, Director, Women's Heart CenterDirector, Preventive Cardiac Center
Professor of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 444 S San Vicente Blvd
Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90048
USA
Phone: 310-423-9680
Fax: 310-423-3522

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Jones E, Greenfield N, Mehta PK, Shufelt C, Thomson L, Merz CNB. Polycythemia vera and microvascular dysfunction in a 26-year-old male presenting with chest pain. Int J Case Rep Images 2015;6(5):305–308.


Abstract
Introduction: Signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia in the setting of no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is often found in women. One of the mechanisms thought to contribute is coronary vascular dysfunction (CVaD). Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) is used to assess endothelial and non-endothelial dependent CVaD, but is not routinely performed.
Case Report: We report a case of a healthy 26-year-old male with persistent chest pain after ST elevation myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed normal rest and stress first pass perfusion, with an incidental finding of an enlarged spleen. He underwent CRT and was found to have slow flow and coronary endothelial dysfunction. Due to his enlarged spleen and an elevated hematocrit at 50% he was referred to a hematologist and diagnosed with polycythemia vera (PV). Although the risk of thrombosis and myocardial infarction is known in PV, the pathophysiology is not well understood. In our patient no thrombus was visualized on angiogram.
Conclusion: The findings of his CRT in the setting of PV offer an interesting link between hematological disorders, endothelial dysfunction, and persistent chest pain with no obstructive CAD.

Keywords: Chest pain, Coronary endothelial dysfunction, Coronary reactivity testing, Microvascular dysfunction, Polycythemia vera


Introduction

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative disorder, associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The mechanism for developing these adverse cardiovascular (CV) events has been attributed to the development of thrombosis, either in the micro or macro vasculature, however, recent reports have suggested that there may be more to the pathophysiology, especially for young patients with this disease who present with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia [1].

There is a growing body of evidence showing that one cause of myocardial ischemia and persistent chest pain in patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and endothelial dysfunction [2]. CMD refers to impaired hyperemic response of the myocardial resistant vessels in response to exercise or vasodilator stimuli. CMD can be due to endothelial or non-endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction is a proposed mechanism of chest pain, ischemia, and even infarction in at least some cases of patients with PV [3]. We present a case of an otherwise healthy 26-year-old male who developed a MI as his initial presentation of PV and was found to have endothelial dysfunction on invasive coronary reactivity testing (CRT).


Case Report

A 26-year-old male with a past medical history significant for eosinophilic esophagitis and acid reflux presented to the emergency department with a three month history of atypical, progressively worsening substernal chest pain. The chest pain began suddenly and was not associated with exertion or emotion. Given his lack of cardiac risk factors and history of GERD, the chest pain was previously attributed to esophageal spasms for which he was prescribed sublingual nitroglycerin, omeprazole, dexlansoprazole, calcium channel blockers and amitriptyline, none of which relieved his pain. On the day of his emergency department visit his substernal chest pain worsened to 10/10. His EKG had ST elevations in leads I, II and avF, labs showed an elevated troponin level that peaked at 1.55, elevated hematocrit (50%), an elevated white blood cell count (15.37 K/uL) and no splenomegaly appreciated on exam. Echo showed normal left ventricular systolic function with no wall motion abnormalities. A cardiac catheterization demonstrated no obstructive CAD, no thrombus was visualized, but slow flow was evident in his left anterior descending artery (LAD). Given lack of evidence of any obstructive CAD his symptoms were thought to be secondary to pericarditis. His pain persisted and with no clear etiology of his chest pain, the patient sought further investigations.

The patient was referred to our facility for further workup where he received a regadenoson stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) myocardial perfusion study which showed normal rest and stress first pass perfusion, normal biventricular systolic function, no evidence of scar by delayed enhancement. Incidental note was made of splenomegaly with liver length, 16 cm on scout images (Figure 1). Given persistent chest pain and a history of an ST elevation MI, he underwent CRT to clarify diagnosis and to assess endothelial and non-endothelial dependent micro and macro vascular function. CRT was performed by placing a Doppler FloWire (Volcano Inc., San Diego, USA) in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Vasoactive substances were infused through a guiding catheter placed in the left main, and changes in LAD diameter and blood flow velocity in response to adenosine, acetylcholine and nitroglycerin were measured. We confirmed slow flow with a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 2 flow and a TIMI frame count of 42 with a corrected TIMI frame count of 25. His CRT findings are outlined in Table 1.

The patient was seen by a hematologist who confirmed a Jak2 mutation and an elevated hematocrit (Hct), consistent with a diagnosis of PV. He was started on aspirin, pegylated interferon, and phlebotomies to keep his Hct below 45%, which improved his symptoms. He continues to experience occasional chest pain, dizziness and fatigue although generally feels drastically improved from his initial presentation.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: Coronal scout image done at the time of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging incidentally found increased craniocaudal dimension of the spleen (*) 16 cm.



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Table 1: Coronary Reactivity Testing Results



Discussion

Chest pain is a common chief complaint with a wide differential diagnosis. Problems with diagnosis and treatments arise when patients present with atypical symptoms and/or have little to no risk factors for heart disease. We describe an unusual case of a previously healthy young man with no known cardiac risk factors, in whom an ST elevation MI with no obstructive CAD was the first presentation of PV. There is a growing body of evidence that one of the causes of ischemia with no obstructive CAD is coronary vascular dysfunction (CVaD) [2]. Endothelial and non-endothelial dependent vascular function can be abnormal in those with no obstructive CAD who have signs and symptoms of ischemia, and should be considered as an etiology in those with unexplained chest pain. If a coronary angiogram is performed and no thrombosis is visualized then perhaps CRT may add further diagnostic information. In this case the patient demonstrated slow flow which is considered a marker for increased microvascular resistance and endothelial dysfunction [4] .

Patients with PV are predisposed to vascular complications such as venous and arterial thrombosis5. Prior thrombotic event and age >65 are the two risk factors that increase risk of further CV events in patients with PV [5]. The pathogenesis of coronary thrombosis seen in PV is not fully understood, however it is likely that multiple factors play a part such as hyperviscosity with decreased blood flow, platelet activation and functional abnormalities, leukocyte and platelet aggregation [6]. Increased platelet activation through interaction between abnormal hematocrit, activated white cells, turbulent flow can provoke endothelial activation and injury [6]. Nuenteufl et al. [3] investigated endothelium-dependent flow mediated vasodilation (FMD) and endothelium-independent nitroglycerin-induced vasodilation (NMD) in patients with PV versus controls and found that FMD but not NMD was significantly impaired in patients with PV leading to the thought that endothelial dysfunction may play a role in thromboembolic complications.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with PV is thought to be due to coronary thrombosis in large coronary arteries which can be seen on coronary angiography but microthrombi in the coronary microcirculation are not visualized on catheterization. There are case reports of PV presenting as an ST elevation MI with visualized coronary lesions and distal thrombosis [7]; however there are other case reports where an angiogram was performed showing normal coronary arteries in both patient with PV and essential thrombocytosis (ET) [1]. Rossi et al. compared characteristics in patient with PV versus ET and found that ACS was more common in PV, 11.4% versus 9.4%, raising the question of whether ACS is indeed caused by platelet rich thrombi [8]. Studies have shown that thrombi are more common in PV versus ET and therefore thrombocytosis alone is not sufficient to explain coronary thrombi and other mechanisms such as slow flow, hyperviscosity, microvascular and endothelial dysfunction as a cause of ACS may need to be further investigated. Leukocytosis, which was present in our patient, has been shown to be a risk factor for developing thrombosis [9]. Falanga et al. [10] showed that activated leukocyte markers were simultaneously elevated with markers of endothelial damage including thrombomodulin and von Willebrand factor antigen in both patients with PV and ET compared to controls.


Conclusion

We report a young male patient whose first presentation of polycythemia vera (PV) was an ST elevation MI, followed by persistent chest pain, who had an abnormal coronary vascular reactivity test. Coronary slow flow and endothelial dysfunction should be considered in patients with persistent chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as in this case. The findings of his abnormal coronary reactivity testing (CRT) in the setting of PV offer an interesting link between hematological disorders, endothelial dysfunction and persistent chest pain with no obstructive CAD.


References
  1. Tekin M, Gokaslan S, Diker E, Aydogdu S. Development of acute coronary syndrome in three patients with essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2008 Jan;36(1):35–8. [Article in Turkish].   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2825–32.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Neunteufl T, Heher S, Stefenelli T, Pabinger I, Gisslinger H. Endothelial dysfunction in patients with polycythaemia vera. Br J Haematol 2001 Nov;115(2):354–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Beltrame JF, Limaye SB, Wuttke RD, Horowitz JD. Coronary hemodynamic and metabolic studies of the coronary slow flow phenomenon. Am Heart J 2003 Jul;146(1):84–90.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Marchioli R, Finazzi G, Landolfi R, et al. Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort of patients with polycythemia vera. J Clin Oncol 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2224–32.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Harrison CN. Platelets and thrombosis in myeloproliferative diseases. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2005:409–15.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Wu CF, Armstrong GP, Henderson RA, Ruygrok PN. Polycythaemia vera presenting as ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Lung Circ 2005 Mar;14(1):51–3.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Rossi C, Randi ML, Zerbinati P, Rinaldi V, Girolami A. Acute coronary disease in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. J Intern Med 1998 Jul;244(1):49–53.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Landolfi R, Di Gennaro L, Barbui T, et al. Leukocytosis as a major thrombotic risk factor in patients with polycythemia vera. Blood 2007 Mar 15;109(6):2446–52.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Falanga A, Marchetti M, Evangelista V, et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte activation and hemostasis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Blood 2000 Dec 15;96(13):4261–6.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Erika Jones – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Nava Greenfield – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Puja K. Mehta – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Chrisandra Shufelt – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Louise Thomson – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
C. Noel Bairey Merz – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2015 Erika Jones et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.