Case Report
 
An unusual presentation of encapsulating sclerosing peritonitis
Emmi Khoo1, Dharmenaan Palamuthusingam2, Clyson Mutatiri3
1Medical Registrar, Department of Medicine, Redland Hospital, Cleveland, Queensland, Australia.
2Renal Registrar, Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
3Consultant General Physician, Department of Medicine, Bundaberg Base Hospital, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-201536-CR-10497

Address correspondence to:
Dharmenaan Palamuthsingam
Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road Woolloongabba
Queensland 4102
Australia
Phone: 0409891385
Fax: 0011 07 31765747

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Khoo E, Palamuthusingam D, Mutatiri C. An unusual presentation of encapsulating sclerosing peritonitis. Int J Case Rep Images 2015;6(4):211–215.


Abstract
Introduction: Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) is a rare condition. Underlying cause of SEP is believed to be multifactorial. It can occur secondary to several conditions like prior episodes of severe peritonitis, use of beta-blockers, history of peritoneal dialysis, autoimmune disease, intra-abdominal malignancies, exposure to chemicals such as silicosis or asbestosis, endometriotic cyst, uterine leiomyomas, ovarian tumors, sarcoidosis, or tuberculosis.
Case Report: We report an unusual case of a 74-year-old male patient of Dutch descent presented with intermittent watery diarrhea, recurrent ascites and bilateral lower limb lymphedema.
Conclusion: Symptoms of the patient at initial presentation were non-specific. Bilateral lower limb lymphedema has not been previously identified in literature as a presenting symptom of this disease. Clinicians need to have a higher index of suspicion for the diagnosis of SEP in those that present with bilateral lower limb lymphedema and non-specific abdominal symptoms. The etiology of SEP in this patient remains unclear, which is consistent with most of the cases reported in literature to date.

Keywords: Ascites, Bowel obstruction, Lymphedema, Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis


Introduction

Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) is a rare condition with varying prevalence around the world. An Australian study identified 54 cases in 14 years, indicating prevalence of 0.7% [1]. This compares with a prevalence of 3.3% described in a UK series [2].

Underlying cause of SEP is believed to be multifactorial [3]. It can occur secondary to several conditions like prior episodes of severe peritonitis, use of beta-blockers, history of peritoneal dialysis, autoimmune disease, intra-abdominal malignancies, exposure to chemicals such as silicosis or asbestosis, endometriotic cyst, uterine leiomyomas, ovarian tumors, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis or it can be idiopathic [4]. There is no significant association between SEP, age and gender [5]. However, notably, idiopathic types are found more commonly among young adolescent female in tropical and sub-tropical areas [4].


Case Report

A 74-year-old male lived his life in Australia and very rarely traveled overseas. He has never smoked tobacco or consumed alcohol. He has a known history of transient ischemic attack four years ago, left knee osteoarthritis, depression, and hypercholesterolemia. His medications include escitalopram 20 mg mane, lorazepam 1 mg nocte and rosuvastatin 5 mg mane. Examination revealed normal cardiovascular and respiratory system and his abdomen was soft, with no masses but was positive for shifting dullness. He also had bilateral pitting edema up to his mid-thighs.

Initial biochemistry, full blood count and liver function tests were unremarkable (Table 1). An echocardiogram showed normal right and left ventricular function and normal valves. An ultrasound (USS) of the abdomen confirmed more than 1 L of ascites but normal liver and spleen dimensions with no ultrasonographic evidence of portal hypertension. The USS of his lower limbs did not demonstrate deep venous thrombosis. Computed tomography (CT) scan of his abdomen showed mild heterogeneity of the greater omentum in the upper abdomen, some circumferential thickening of the sigmoid, and few sclerotic foci in axial skeleton.

A abdominal paracentesis performed was cloudy in appearance but cytology and biochemistry were unremarkable. The surgeons performed a sigmoidoscopy and subsequent biopsies revealed normal large intestinal architecture.

A diagnosis remained elusive and the patient was treated symptomatically with bumetanide 1 mg mane but there was no clinical improvement.

Ultimately, a radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy confirmed bilateral distal 'dermal backflow', consistent with bilateral lymphedema. A provisional diagnosis of lymphangitis was made based on these findings he was commenced on prednisolone 50 mg daily.

After four weeks on steroid treatment, his edema had reduced significantly and his bowel symptoms improved.

Despite improved symptomatology, he was revisited by the surgeon in clinic, who continued to be suspicious for intra-abdominal malignancy and insisted on diagnostic laparoscopy being performed. At the time of the operation, the small bowel looked normal with white plaque-like patches in some areas. The surgeon converted to an exploratory laparotomy via a midline incision and noted the cecum feeling and appearing fibrotic and having some whitish areas resembling scarring in pelvic peritoneum. The sigmoid colon was adherent to pelvic sidewall, and the omentum was shrunken with obliteration of lesser sac. Several peritoneal biopsies were taken.

The histology of peritoneal biopsy revealed tissues containing bland spindle cells separated by collagen, some of which is thick and eosinophilic; with rare mitotic figure noted but no atypical figures were identified. Omental tissue biopsies showed thin submesothelial zone of collagenous connective tissue containing cytologically bland spindle cells, similar to those seen in the peritoneal biopsy. These histological features were consistent with sclerosing peritonitis. However, at this point in time the diagnosis SEP was overlooked for multiple reasons. Firstly, the experienced surgeon did not feel that at the time of the operation, the macroscopic appearance of the abdomen was not consistent with the typically described 'cocoon-like' appearance. Secondly, the patients' presentation was not a characteristic manifestation of SEP that had been previously documented in literature.

Unfortunately, the patient developed acute bowel obstruction and died from sepsis eight months later.


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Table 1: Initial investigations performed



Discussion

Underlying cause of SEP is believed to be multifactorial [3]. It can occur secondary to several conditions like prior episodes of severe peritonitis, use of beta-blockers, history of peritoneal dialysis, autoimmune disease, intra-abdominal malignancies, exposure to chemicals such as silicosis or asbestosis, endometriotic cyst, uterine leiomyomas, ovarian tumors, sarcoidosis, or tuberculosis [4]. Or it can be idiopathic. There is no significant association between SEP, age and gender [5]. However, notably, idiopathic types are found more commonly among young adolescent female in tropical and subtropical areas [4].

Common clinical features at presentation of SEP are abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, constipation and weight loss [5]. Other than symptoms of bowel obstruction, SEP may present with features of fluid overload like ascites and edema. In those undergoing PD this is attributable to the progressive loss of ultrafiltration. This is a result of peritoneal scarring and adhesions by fibrocollagenous membrane which leads to the loss of surface area for ultrafiltration [6]. Repeated episodes of peritonitis are believed to accelerate the process [7].

Preoperative diagnosis is non-specific. Imaging techniques are helpful but not diagnostic. Plain abdominal X-ray may show signs of bowel obstruction [8] [9]. Small bowel intestine loops congregated in a single area in the peritoneal cavity, encased by a soft tissue-density mantle may be seen on abdominal CT scans [10]. Other features like signs of obstruction, agglutination and fixation of intestinal loops, mural thickening, peritoneal thickening or calcification and reactive adenopathy may also be present [10]. Ultrasonography may illustrate ineffective peristaltic contractions, dilated fixed intestinal segments matted together and tethered posteriorly, intraperitoneal echogenic strands, trilaminar appearance of the bowel wall, and loculated free fluid [9] [11] [12]. The "cauliflower sign" is the conglomeration of bowel loops that appear to adhere to each other surrounded by a sac-like structure. This along with delayed transit of contrast medium are characteristics of SEP and can be found on contrast study including barium X-ray and contrast CT scab [8].

Ultimately, the diagnosis of abdominal cocoon is based on intraoperative and histopathology findings. During surgery, encapsulation of entire or partial intestine in thick white fibrous "cocoon-like" membrane is seen; and histology of membrane reveals proliferation of fibrocytes and enrichment of collagen fiber, with non-specific inflammatory reaction and vascular proliferation [8].

Surgical adhesiolysis is the gold standard in treatment of patients with recurrent bowel obstruction secondary to SEP [8] [11]. Other alternate treatment options for milder cases include TPN and nasogastric decompression [11].

Many reports in literature describe the beneficial effects of immunosuppressive agents on the progression of SEP [12] [13] [14]. Patients with SEP have been successfully treated with corticosteroids alone or in combination with azathioprine [11] [14] [15]. Examples of other immunosuppressants like colchicine, tamoxifen, renin- angiotensin inhibitors, phosphatidylcholine and antifibrotic agents have also been trialed in management of mild disease and outcomes were inconclusive [11] [12]. A study in Japan showed that two-year survival among patients treated with steroids was 73%; while among patients not receiving such treatment, the two- year survival was only 48% [11]. It was proposed that immunosuppressive therapy could slow the progression of SEP by reducing the production of inflammatory mediators, which promote fibrinogenesis; hence, formation of fibrous capsule [12]. Due to the sporadic nature and low incidence of the disease, there is a lack of literature to conclude on the significance of long-term immunosuppressive therapy and treatment durations have varied between 3–4 months to life-long treatment [11] [14] [15].

This patient's symptoms at initial presentation were non-specific. His symptoms centered mainly on bilateral lower limb non-pitting lymphedema with ascites and some weight loss, with no indication of bowel obstruction. In a case series by Ping et al., all five of their patients experienced symptoms between 2 weeks to 10 years, before a diagnosis was confirmed. Those symptoms included recurrent episodes of intestinal obstruction, colicky abdominal pain, non-bilious vomiting, abdominal distension and constipation [16]. In our case, underlying malignancy had been considered high on the list of differentials. In retrospect, there were some initial features which were suggestive of SEP but this diagnosis had not been entertained preoperatively. His first episode of acute bowel obstruction occurred 10 months after this.

The aetiology of SEP in this gentleman remains unclear, which is consistent with most of the cases reported in literature to date.


Conclusion

This case report highlights that clinicians need to have a higher index of suspicion for the diagnosis of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) in those that present with bilateral lower limb lymphedema and non-specific abdominal symptoms.


References
  1. Rigby RJ, Hawley CM. Sclerosing peritonitis: The experience in Australia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998 Jan;13(1):154–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Summers AM, Clancy MJ, Syed F, et al. Single-centre experience of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in patients on peritoneal dialysis for end stage renal failure. Kidney Int 2005 Nov;68(5):2381–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Kawaguchi Y, Tranaeus A. A historical review of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. Perit Dial Int 2005 Apr;25 Suppl 4:S7–13.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Kaushik R, Punia RP, Mohan H, Attri AK. Tuberculosis abdominal cocoon--a report of 6 cases and review of the literature. World J Emerg Surg 2006 Jun 27;1:18.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Brown MC, Simpson K, Kerssens JJ, Mactier RA. Encapsulating pertineal sclerosis in the new millennium: A national cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009 Jul;4(7):1222–9.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Pollock CA, Ibels LS, Hallett MD, et al. Loss of ultrafiltration in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Perit Dial Int 1989;9(2):107–10.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Albrektsen GE, Widerøe TE, Nilsen TI, et al. Transperitoneal water transport before, during, and after episodes with infectious peritonitis in patients treated with CAPD. Am J Kidney Dis 2004 Mar;43(3):485–91.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Wei B, Wei HB, Guo WP, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of abdominal cocoon: A report of 24 cases. Am J Surg 2009 Sep;198(3):348–53.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Xu P, Chen LH, Li YM. Idiopathic sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (or abdominal cocoon): A report of 5 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2007 Jul 14;13(26):3649–51.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Hur J, Kim KW, Park MS, Yu JS. Abdominal cocoon: Preoperative diagnostic clues from radiologic imaging with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 Mar;182(3):639–41.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10
  11. Solak A, Solak I. Abdominal cocoon syndrome: Preoperative diagnostic criteria, good clinical outcome with medical treatment and review of the literature. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012;23(6):776–9.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 11
  12. Nakamoto H. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis - a clinician's approach to diagnosis and medical treatment. Peritoneal Dialysis International 2005;25(4):530–8.    Back to citation no. 12
  13. Junor BJ, McMillan MA. Immunosuppression in sclerosing peritonitis. Adv Perit Dial 1993;9:187–9.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 13
  14. Mori Y, Matsuo S, Sutoh H, Toriyama T, Kawahara H, Hotta N. A case of dialysis patient with sclerosing peritonitis successfully treated with corticosteroid therapy alone. Am J Kidney Dis 1997 Aug;30(2):275–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 14
  15. Martin LS, Rodrigues AS, Cabrita AN, Guimaraes S. Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis: A case successfully treated with immunosuppression. Perit Dial Int 1999 Sep-Oct;19(5):478–1.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 15
  16. Xu P, Chen LH, Li YM. Idiopathic sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (or abdominal cocoon): A report of 5 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2007 Jul 14;13(26):3649–51.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 16

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Emmi Khoo – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Dharmenaan Palamuthusingam – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Clyson Mutatiri – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2015 Emmi Khoo et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.