Case Report
 
Atypical BCR-ABL fusion transcript (e6a2) in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Dushyant Kumar1, Manoj Kumar Panigrahi1, Deepti Dewangan2, Sarjana Dutt3, Khaliqur Rahman4, Anurag Mehta5
1M.Tech, Jr. Scientist, Molecular Biology Lab, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India.
2B. Tech, Jr. Scientist, Molecular Biology Lab, GenX Diagnostic, Delhi, India.
3Phd, Associate Director, Research and Development, Oncquest Laboratory Ltd., Delhi, India.
4MD, Hematopathologist, Hematology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India.
5MD, Director, Lab Services and Blood Bank, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-2014-01-437-CR-10

Address correspondence to:
Dushyant Kumar
Jr. Scientist (Molecular Biology Lab)
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre Sector-7 Rohini
Delhi
India 110085
Phone: +91 9891099329
Fax: +91 1127051059
Email: dushyant.leo@gmail.com

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article
Kumar D, Panigrahi MK, Dewangan D, Dutt S, Rahman K, Mehta A. Atypical BCR-ABL fusion transcript (e6a2) in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. International Journal of Case Reports and Images 2014;5(1):45–49.


Abstract
Introduction: Among precursor-B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases, BCR-ABL translocation occurs in around 20–30% of adults and in ≤5% of children. Minor breakpoint transcripts (e1a2) are found in about 70% of positive BCR-ABL cases and major breakpoint transcripts (e13a2, e14a2) in about 30% cases. However, other atypical transcripts are sometimes observed.
Case Report: A rare form of chimeric BCR-ABL fusion transcript (e6a2) was detected in a pediatric patient with precursor-B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Sequence analysis of the fusion region of the amplified cDNA fragment showed an in-frame joining of exon 6 of the BCR gene and exon 2 of the ABL gene, giving rise to an e6a2 BCR-ABL transcript. This finding was also confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization.
Conclusion: The findings in this case shows that atypical BCR-ABL transcripts are detectable in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients without M-BCR-rearrangements. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction using primers that allow for amplification of all known BCR-ABL transcripts is an appropriate method to detect these rare variants.

Keywords: BCR-ABL, PCR, FISH, e6a2


Introduction

BCR-ABL fusion transcripts are found in around 20–30% of adults and in ≤5% of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] BCR-ABL is of interest in ALL for two reasons. Firstly, those affected are known to have a poor prognosis under conventional therapy [8] [9] and are therefore considered high risk patients and primarily candidate for intensified therapy regime, including allogeneic transplantations. Secondly, BCR-ABL positive patients can have a better prognosis under treatment regime with ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib. [10] Commonly three typical BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts e1a2, e13a2, e14a2, are found in about 99% of BCR-ABL positive cases but several atypical ones (e13a3, e14a3, e1a3, e19a2, e6a2) have also been observed. [11] (Figure 1) However, these variants were observed exclusively in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cases, and very little is known about atypical transcript in ALL.

Herein, we report such an atypical BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts e6a2 by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in pediatric ALL in Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre (India).


Case Report

A five-year-old boy was presented to our hospital with complaint of lymphadenoid and abdominal pain. On examination he was diagnosed with multiple lymph nodes and splenomegaly. His complete blood count examination showed, hemoglobin 9.2 g/dL, total leukocyte count 3600, peripheral smear showed 12% blasts, with lymphoid morphology, 2% polymorphs and platelet count 8000/mm3. No eosinophils, basophils and monocytes were observed in his blood. Bone marrow examination showed 69% blast of lymphoid morphology which was myeloperoxidase (MPO) negative.

Immunophenotyping: This was carried out using flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, USA) on bone marrow sample. Using CD45 and side scatter gating 73.41% cells were gated. These cells were dim positive to negative for CD45. These were also positive for CD34 (84.37%), CD10 (76.89%), CD19 (81.65%), cyto CD79a (92.21%), cytoCD22 (97.16%), TDT (47.99%), CD123 (85.01%), and HLA-DR (94.75%). Based on immunophenotype features, it was diagnosed as precursor-B-ALL. The sample was analyzed for common ALL translocations by RT-PCR.

RT-PCR: After red blood lyses RNA was isolated using QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit Cat. No. 52304. RNA quantity and quality was checked by ultraviolet spectrophotometer and by running on 1.2% MOPS buffer gel. The cDNA synthesis was carried out by RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA synthesis Kit (#K1632) by Thermo Scientific. PCR done for BCR-ABL fusion transcript using primers

BCR 12 FP -5’-TGCTGACCAACTCGTGTGTG-3’ (BCR exon 13)

BCR 1 FP- 5’-AACTCGCAACAGTCCTTCGAC-3’ (BCR exon1)

ABL 3 -5’-CCATTCCCCATTGTGATTATAGC-3’ (ABL exon 3)

FISH: Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) done by using Pathvysion dual color dual fusion translocations probe (08L10-001) Kit Abbott Molecular. In which spectrum green was for BCR gene and spectrum orange was for ABL gene.

Sequencing: Amplified product was sequenced with the Big Dye Terminator v1.1 cycle sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and run in an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer and results were evaluated.

Results: The RT-PCR showed an atypical large amplicon of 1026bp correspond to e6a2 breakpoint using the primers BCR1 FP and ABL 3 RP, (Figure 2A) Unlike 384 bp products for e1a2 breakpoint by using the same primers. Patient sample also analyzed for other three common ALL translocations (12;21,1;19,4;11) and were found negative.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed by using dual color dual fusion probe we found that there is fusion between BCR and ABL gene (Figure 2B) 55 of the 100 interphase nuclei of the bone marrow smear showed fusion of BCR and ABL gene.

Sequencing result showed identical fusion between exon 6 of BCR gene and exon 2 of ABL gene result in an e6a2 fusion transcript were found. (Figure 2C)


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: BCR and ABL breakpoint regions and resulting fusion transcripts. (A) BCR gene with breakpoint regions. The BCR exons that can be fused in-frame with ABL exons 2 or 3 are e1, e6, e12, e13, e14, e19, and e20. Thus four breakpoint cluster regions (bcr) can be distinguished in the BCR gene: minor (m-) BCR between e1 and e2, major (M-) BCR between e12 and e15, micro (μ-) BCR between e19 and e21, and the region between e6 and e7, here analogously denoted “nano” (ν-) BCR. BCR exons that could theoretically be spliced without a reading frame shift, i.e. with a nucleotide number divisible by three, are marked with an asterisk (*). The size of the introns is not to scale, (B) ABL and BCR mRNAs with location of primers, (C) BCR–ABL mRNA fusion transcripts with breakpoints [12].



Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 2: (A) Agarose gel shows the typical BCR-ABL transcripts, e13a2 (277bp), e14a2 (352bp), e1a2 (384bp) (lane 3,4,5) lane 6 shows the atypical one sample product at 1026 bp. Lane 2 is the internal control and lane 1, 7 are the 50–1000 bp molecular ladder lane 8 is Non template control and 9 and 10 for normal sample internal control and BCR-ABL fusion product. (B) BCR-ABL fusion gene transcript by Pathvysion dual colour dual fusion probe, (C) Sequencing result shows the fusion between exon 6 of BCR gene and exon 2 of ABL gene.



Discussion

Using RT-PCR, we were able to detect atypical e6a2 BCR-ABL transcript in a pediatric patient with precursor-B-ALL, which also be demonstrated by FISH as well as sequencing and no M-BCR rearrangement was seen by RT-PCR. This is an unusual transcript has only been reported in seven patients with myeloid leukemias, 4 with chronic-phase CML, 1 with acute basophilic leukemia. [13] To the best of our knowledge, this patient is the first Indian pediatric BCR-ABL+ precursor-B-ALL with a breakpoint outside M-BCR and the first case to express an e6a2 BCR-ABL. It has been hypothesized that CML patients with e6a2 BCR-ABL transcript may have a worse prognosis possibly because they lack the (GET)/dbl-like domain of BCR. [14] However, there is one study done by Burmeister et al. in which they have shown that an adult ALL patient with BCR-ABL+ (e6a2) breakpoint showed complete remission after induction of allogeneic transplant and still in complete cytogenetic remission on imatinib. [15] Our patient showed good prednisolone response with an absolute blast count of 32 cells/mm3 on day eight of steroid administration. And complete cytogenetic remission on imatinib until 70 days. Still the patient is on imatinib. Till date there is no data on adult and pediatric precursor-B-ALL with BCR-ABL (e6a2) fusion transcript has been reported in India.


Conclusion

Our result suggests that most of the atypical transcripts known from chronic myeloid leukemia can also found in BCR-ABL+ ALL. The e6a2 is the rarest atypical BCR-ABL transcript in pediatric Precursor-B-ALL. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction based BCR-ABL diagnosis should be design in such a way that it can detect all typical (e13a2, e14a2, e1a2) as well as atypical (e13a3,e14a3, e1a3, e6a2, e19a2) fusion transcripts. Patients with these transcripts also respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. A complementary cytogenetic analysis remains mandatory.


Acknowledgements

The author thanks Dr. Kabir Sachdeva for his valuable assistance for guiding me to publish this case report.


References
  1. Rieder H, Bonwetsch C, Janssen LA, et al. High rate of chromosome abnormalities detected by ?uorescence in situ hybridization using BCR and ABL probes in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 1998;12(9):1473–81.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Copelan EA, McGuire EA. The biology and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. Blood 1995;85(5):1151–68.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Secker-Walker LM, Craig JM, Hawkins JM, Hoffbrand AV. Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: Age distribution, BCR breakpoint and prognostic significance. Leukemia 1991;5(3):196–9.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Annino L, Ferrari A, Cedrone M, et al. Adult Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Experience of treatments during a ten-year period. Leukemia 1994;8(4):664–7.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Secker-Walker LM, Pentrice HG, Durrant J, Richards S, Hall E, Harrison G. Cytogenetics adds independent prognostic information in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia on MRC trial UKALL XA. MRC Adult Leukaemia Working Party. Br J Haematol 1997;96(3):601–10.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Pui CH, Crist WM, Look AT. Biology and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1990;76(8):1449–63.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Pui CH, Evans WE. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1998;339(9):605–15.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Schlieben S, Borkhardt A, Reinisch I, et al. Incidence and clinical outcome of children with BCR/ABL-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A prospective RT-PCR study based on 673 patients enrolled in the German pediatric multicenter therapy trials ALL-BFM-90 and CoALL-05-92. Leukemia 1996;10(6):957–63.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Gleissner B, Gökbuget N, Bartram CR, et al. Leading prognostic relevance of the BCR-ABL translocation in adult acute B-lineage lymphoblastic leukemia: A prospective study of the German Multicenter Trial Group and confirmed polymerase chain reaction analysis. Blood 2002;99(5):1536–43.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Wassmann B, Gökbuget N, Scheuring UJ, et al. A randomized multicenter open label phase II study to determine the safety and efficacy of induction therapy with imatinib (Glivec, formerly STI571) in comparison with standard induction chemotherapy in elderly (>55 years) patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+/BCR-ABL+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (CSTI571ADE 10). Ann Hematol 2003;82(11):716–20.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10
  11. Melo JV. The diversity of BCR-ABL fusion proteins and their relationship to leukemia phenotype. Blood 1996;88(7):2375–84.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 11
  12. Thomas Burmeister, Richard Reinhardt. A multiplex PCR for improved detection of typical and atypical BCR-ABL fusion transcripts. Leukemia Research 2008;32(4):579–85.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 12
  13. Grégoire MJ, Latger-Cannard V, Staal A, et al. Identification of an acute basophilic leukaemia carrying a rare e6a2 BCR-ABL transcript. Acta Haematol 2006;116(3):216–8.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 13
  14. Colla S, Sammarelli G, Voltolini S, Crugnola M, Sebastio P, Giuliani N. e6a2 BCR-ABL transcript in chronic myeloid leukemia: Is it associated with aggressive disease? Haematologica 2004;89(5):611–3.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 14
  15. Thomas Burmeister, Stefan Schwartz, Almut Taubald, et al. Atypical BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2007;92(12):1699–702.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 15

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Dushyant Kumar – Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Critical revision of the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi – Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Deepti Dewangan – Analysis and interpretation of data Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Khaliqur Rahman – Conception and design, Critical revision of the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Sarjana Dutt – Analysis and interpretation of data, Critical revision of the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Anurag Mehta – Conception and design, Critical revision of the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© Dushyant Kumar et al. 2014; This article is distributed the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any means provided the original authors and original publisher are properly credited. (Please see Copyright Policy for more information.)



About The Authors

Dushyant kumaris Scientist in Molecular Biology Department at (Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India). His research interests include Leukemia. He intends to pursue PhD in future.



Manoj kumar Panigrahiis Jr. Scientist in Molecular Biology Department at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India. His research interests include Leukemia. He intends to pursue PhD in future.



Deepti Dewanganis currently Jr. Scientist in Molecular Biology Department at GenX Diagnostic, New Delhi, India. Her research interests include Flow Cytometry. She intends to pursue PhD in future.



< Sarjana Duttis Associate Director in R&D Department at Oncquest Laboratory Ltd. Her research interests include (Molecular Biology of Cancer). She intends to pursue (more research work on cancer) in future. She has published 8 research papers in academic journals.



Khaliqur Rahmanis Hematopathologist in Hematopatholy Lab at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India. His research interests include Flow Cytometry. He has published 8 research papers in academic journals.



Anurag Mehtais Director Lab Services at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India. His research interests include Molecular Biology of Cancer. He has published 15 research papers in academic journals.