Case Report
 
Lyme arthritis versus acute bacterial arthritis: A diagnostic dilemma
Dinushan Kaluarachchi1, Magda Mendez2, Shefali Khanna3
1Pediatric Resident, Department of Pediatrics, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY.
2Program Director, Pediatric Residency Program, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center Assistant Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College.
3Director, Pediatric Department, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center Assistant Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College.

doi:10.5348/ijcri-2012-12-240-CR-14

Address correspondence to:
Dinushan Kaluarachchi
MD 234, E 149th Street
Bronx
NY 10451
Phone: 347 279 5014
Fax: 718 579 5030
Email: dinushank@yahoo.com

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]


How to cite this article:
Kaluarachchi D, Mendez M, Khanna S. Lyme arthritis versus acute bacterial arthritis: A diagnostic dilemma. International Journal of Case Reports and Images 2012;3(12):62–64.


Abstract
Introduction: Lyme disease is a known cause of monoarticular arthritis in Lyme endemic areas. It must be differentiated from other types of acute monoarticular arthritis such as acute bacterial arthritis.
Case Report: In this report, we discuss the case of a 9-year-old boy who presented to emergency room with left wrist monoarthritis of one day's duration. Initial laboratory evidence were suggestive of septic arthiritis and treatment was initiated for the presumed diagnosis of septic arthritis, but high index of suspicion lead to further investigations and diagnosis of Lyme arthritis.
Conclusion: Diagnosis of Lyme arthritis may be difficult. Exposure in an endemic area and clinical findings may help distinguish it from acute bacterial arthritis.

Keywords: Lyme arthritis, Acute bacterial arthritis, Borrelia burgdoferi


Introduction

Lyme disease is a common cause of monoarticular arthritis in Lyme endemic areas. Lyme arthritis is a late manifestation of Lyme disease, occurring in seven percent of patients with Lyme disease. [1] This form of arthritis must be differentiated from other types of acute monoarticular arthritis such as acute bacterial arthritis. This differentiation is important for treatment and prognosis. Failure to diagnose and treat Lyme arthritis can result in persistent joint symptoms and risk of developing additional disease manifestations. In this report, we discuss a patient who presented with wrist monoarthritis, who was initially treated as septic arthritis, but later turned out to be Lyme arthritis.


Case Report

A 9-year-old previously healthy, African-American boy presented to emergency room (ER) with history of one day's swelling and pain of the left wrist joint. Movements of the affected joint were restricted due to pain. There was no history of fever, rashes or other joint involvement. Patient denied trauma or insect bites. He was treated in the ER one month back for left knee arthralgia with effusion attributed to a twisting injury. The symptoms were resolved following treatment with ibuprofen. Patient lived in Bronx, NY, but had traveled upstate New York on several occasions, once for a summer camp about six months prior to the presentation.

Swelling and tenderness over left wrist joint was noted on examination. Wrist X-ray revealed no fractures or dislocation. Complete blood count showed WBC count of 8.7x103/mm3 with 57% neutrophils and 40% lymphocytes. The ESR was 40 mm/1st hr. Joint aspiration was performed in the ER. Five milliliters of purulent fluid was drained. Synovial fluid analysis was significant for WBC count of 2.53x105/mm3 with 93% neutrophils. Blood and synovial fluid cultures were sent. Septic arthritis was diagnosed based on the clinical presentation and synovial fluid analysis results. Patient was started on IV ceftriaxone and vancomycin. The next day the patient underwent left wrist irrigation and debridement. Cultures of the blood and synovial fluid were subsequently reported negative.

The clinical diagnosis of septic arthritis was in doubt as the patient did not have fever, significant pain, leukocytosis or significantly high ESR. These findings and the history of left knee arthralgia with effusion one month prior directed to further investigations. Patient underwent further investigations to rule out other possible etiologies.

Serologic tests for Borrelia burgdoferi revealed presence of 9/10 B. burgdoferi specific IgG bands and 3/3 B. burgdoferi specific IgM bands on western blot. The diagnosis of Lyme arthritis was made and patient was discharged on oral amoxicillin to complete 28 days course of the antibiotic. At one week and one month of follow-up after discharge, the wrist pain and swelling had resolved and normal range of movements of the left wrist was observed.


Discussion

Lyme disease is the most common tick borne disease in the US and Europe. Borrelia burgdoferi is the sole cause of the disease in the United States. Lyme arthritis is a late manifestation of Lyme disease, occurring in seven percent of patients with Lyme disease. [1] The arthritis is usually monoarticular or oligoarticular and affects the large joints, particularly the knee joint which is involved in more than 90% cases. [2] [3] There is a wide spectrum in the acuity of presentation of Lyme arthritis and in some instances it may be confused with acute bacterial arthritis. [3] [4]

Clinical features which may help to distinguish Lyme arthritis from acute bacterial arthritis include, [3] [4]

  • In Lyme arthritis, the joint pain is less intense than that associated with bacterial arthritis
  • Most children with Lyme arthritis of the knee joint can walk without difficulty despite some limitation of range of motion.
  • Associated fever and erythema of involved joint is less common in Lyme arthritis.
  • In Lyme arthritis, synovial fluid WBC count usually ranges from 2–6x104/mm3 (but can exceed 1x105/mm3), whereas in acute bacterial arthritis, the synovial fluid WBC count is usually more than 1x105/mm3.
  • If untreated, Lyme arthritis usually lasts for several weeks before resolving, only to recur often in a different joint. [5] Acute bacterial arthritis does not improve without treatment.

Serological responsiveness to B. burgdoferi is the primary laboratory test for diagnosing Lyme arthritis. Criteria for western blot immunoglobulin requires the presence of at least five out of ten specific bands. [6] For Lyme arthritis in the absence of neurologic disease, the recommended initial regimen is oral doxycyline or oral amoxicillin for 28 days. [2] The Infectious Diseases Society of America has suggested cefuroxime as an alternative agent in those with contraindications to doxycycline or amoxicillin.


Conclusion

The diagnosis of Lyme arthritis may be difficult. Exposure in an endemic area and clinical findings may help in distinguishing it from acute bacterial arthritis.


References
  1. Gerber MA, Shapiro ED, Burke GS, Parcells VJ, Bell GL. Lyme disease in children in southeastern Connecticut. Pediatric Lyme Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996;335(17):1270–4.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43(9):1089–34.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Bachman DT, Srivastava G. Emergency department presentations of Lyme disease in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998;14(5):356–61.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Thompson A, Mannix R, Bachur R. Acute pediatric monoarticular arthritis: distinguishing lyme arthritis from other etiologies. Pediatrics 2009;123(3):959–65.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Steere AC, Schoen RT, Taylor E. The clinical evolution of Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1987;107(5):725–31.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44(31):590–1.   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Dinushan Kaluarachchi – Substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data, Clinical patient care, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Magda Mendez – Substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data, Clinical patient care, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Shefali Khanna – Substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data, Clinical patient care, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© Dinushan Kaluarachchi et al. 2012; This article is distributed the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any means provided the original authors and original publisher are properly credited. (Please see Copyright Policy for more information.)